4-15-4d change

[Jurassic Referee]

Contrary to what JAR wrote in his original post, case book play 4.15.4SitD has not changed. Rule 9-5-3 hasn't changed either.

[mick]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Contrary to what JAR wrote in his original post, case book play 4.15.4SitD has not changed. Rule 9-5-3 hasn't changed either.

That would be as I suspected.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Contrary to what JAR wrote in his original post, case book play 4.15.4SitD has not changed. Rule 9-5-3 hasn't changed either.

Actually what changed is rule book 4-15-4d. Nobody mentioned the case book.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Actually what changed is rule book 4-15-4d. Nobody mentioned the case book.

You're right. Rule 9-5-3 hasn't changed though.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

You're right. Rule 9-5-3 hasn't changed though.

I'm trying to keep up with all of this: are there any other rules that haven't changed?

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

You're right. Rule 9-5-3 hasn't changed though.

But rule 9-5-3 had nothing to do with the original thread and has nothing to do with this change.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by just another ref

But rule 9-5-3 had nothing to do with the original thread and has nothing to do with this change.

Whatinthehell are you talking about? You need to go back and read the thread; specifically read my first post in that thread. Mick was arguing the same rule--9-5-3. We both were arguing the intent of 9-5-3, which rule hasn't changed.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Whatinthehell are you talking about? You need to go back and read the thread; specifically read my first post in that thread. Mick was arguing the same rule--9-5-3. We both were arguing the intent of 9-5-3, which rule hasn't changed.

My play was A1 dribbling the ball and the dribble striking B1's foot.


You said the dribble ended when it struck B1's foot, which apparently the rule book guys disagreed with or the change would not have been necessary.

The rule quoted was 9-5-3 which deals with either a pass or a fumble, neither of which was mentioned in the play in this thread.

You said the ball hitting B1 was considered a fumble, which remains to date as the most outrageous, most wrongest thing I have ever seen you post.

But there's always tomorrow......