| Old School |
Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:44am |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Hey, I <b>know</b> the answers. I've got a better idea. <b>You</b> tell me the difference between a flagrant personal foul and a personal technical foul. You tell me also what the right call should be in your post of 8:59am this morning--post #20 of this thread. And <b>you</b> tell me what the call is if one of the multiple fouls called is a flagrant personal foul.
And I'm still waiting to find out if you still insist that a technical foul of any kind can actually be part of a multiple foul under the rules, as you claimed above.
That'll show everybody that you really do know what you're doing. I await your answers.
|
That's okay, don't answer my question. In fact it's already been answered. Throw-in spot! That's the only difference. Now, do you really want to make a big issue over whether it was a personal or a technical when the only difference is the throw-in spot?
Some of us have better things to do then to quibble over such minor differences. The main thing here, which I got is 2 shots and the ball back, player disqualified. If you want to have a pissing contest over whether we take it out on the baseline or halfcourt. Remember, that's the only difference here. Then I will concede and save you the fluid.:D
You're still wrong about the part where you don't shoot unless you're in the bonus. Did you think I forgot about that? Oh, and one more thing, I never called a technical foul. I said the next time I will call a technical foul and be done with it. No multiple nothing. Last thing, please try not to take this
PERSONAL!! |
