Traveling?

[sseltser]

No there is no travelling violation because there is no clear possession of the ball.

I believe the rules would support that they are BOTH in control of the ball. Therefore, either may be guilty of a travelling violation.

If simultaneous possession meant that travelling could't be called, teams would have two players hold onto the ball as they ran down that floor, wouldn't they?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by sseltser

I believe the rules would support that they are BOTH in control of the ball. Therefore, either may be guilty of a travelling violation.

If simultaneous possession meant that travelling could't be called, teams would have two players hold onto the ball as they ran down that floor, wouldn't they?

Of course, you're correct. The post that you commented on was deleted by a mod. The only purpose of the post was to include a spam link. It's an old trick of spammers.

[Mark Dexter]

Originally Posted by sseltser

If simultaneous possession meant that travelling could't be called, teams would have two players hold onto the ball as they ran down that floor, wouldn't they?

I like the way you think.

To steal borrow from Jurassic - you must be a Red Sox fan.