|
|
|||
Quote:
From 2006-07 NFHS POE 5A. ... Officials must be consistent in the application of all rules, including: • Contact – Contact that is not considered a foul early in the game should not be considered a foul late in the game simply because a team "wants" to foul. Conversely, contact that is deemed intentional late in the game should likewise be called intentional early in the game. |
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
According to the OP this is the action: "B1 contacts A1 with the hand but the action does not re- direct or cause a hindrance in the offensive players normal movement." Quote:
Quote:
(Your best argument for this being a foul has to come from either number 5 or 7 under the POE, but neither seems to apply perfectly to this situation.) RULE 4 SECTION 24 HANDS AND ARMS, LEGAL AND ILLEGAL USE ... ART. 5 . . . It is not legal to use hands on an opponent which in any way inhibits the freedom of movement of the opponent or acts as an aid to a player in starting or stopping. ART. 6 . . . It is not legal to extend the arms fully or partially in a position other than vertical so that the freedom of movement of an opponent is hindered when contact with the arms occurs. ... 2003-04 NFHS POE #2 A. Handchecking: 1.Any tactic using the hands, arms or body that allows a player, on offense or defense, to "control" (hold, impede, push, divert, slow or prevent) the movement of an opposing player is a foul. ... 4.Any act or tactic of illegal use of hands, arms or body (offense or defense) that intentionally slows, prevents, impedes the progress or displaces an opposing player due to the contact, is a foul and must be called. 5.Regardless of where it takes place on the floor, when a player continuously places a hand on the opposing player, it is a foul. 6.When a player places both hands on an opposing player, it is a foul. 7.When a player jabs a hand or forearm on an opponent, it is a foul. |
|
|||
Hand Checking
Ball-Handler / Hand-Checking
Two hands on the ball-handler is a foul. Automatic. One hand that stays on the dribbler is a foul. Remember RSBQ. If the dribbler’s Rhythm, Speed, Balance, or Quickness are affected, we should have a hand-checking foul. |
|
|||
NevadaRef:
My question still stands: Why does B1 need to put his hand on A1? Defenders should be taught and are taught to play defense with their feet not their hands. MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials Ohio High School Athletic Association Toledo, Ohio |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
- "Defenders are NOT permitted to have hands on the dribbler." -"The measuring up of an opponent(tagging) IS hand-checking, is NOT permitted, and is a FOUL." -"Hand checking is NOT incidental contact; it gives a tremendous advantage to the person illegally using their hands." Amazing, eh? The FED says that hand-checking is NOT incidental contact. They also say that just putting a hand on an opponent and then taking it right off(otherwise defined as "tagging") IS a foul. And they repeated those statements word-for-word in the next year's rule book too. You can always find something somewhere in the rules to back up any goofy thesis if you try hard enough. Common sense seems to work better in my experience. Unfortunately, imo common sense seems to come with age and experience--something that you're never going to attain before your retirement from officiating. Fwiw btw, I agree with Rut. There are no absolutes. Last edited by Jurassic Referee; Wed Apr 18, 2007 at 06:09am. |
|
|||
Quote:
Since you have so much experience , I'll let you answer that. |
|
|||
Quote:
If you don't like contact then go play tennis, or consider playing a different sport. Basketball is a contact sport, read rule 4-27. Basketball is not a collision sport. Though the rule does not specificially say, I will not allow contact on the dribbler backcourt to frontcourt. No touching the offensive player bringing the ball up the court. This is a NBA rule that I agree with. Like MTD said, get this contact early and it really cleans the game up for you. |
|
|||
Quote:
I wouldn't say that. Most coaches will blow up from this statement and then you have to give him a T and yeah! |
|
|||
The general rule is, don't respond at all to statements, give a short neutral answer to a reasonable question. However, I find that occasionally, when a coach is making a statement in a way that could be addressed, a simple, "I hear you coach" or, "Thank you, coach" will back him or her off. It can help prevent the emotion from escalating. I'd do that in this case if the coach said it again.
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Score the Basket!!!! |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
If a coach said.... | bossman72 | Baseball | 54 | Sun Mar 18, 2012 09:39am |
Coach asking ump to get help... | Bluefoot | Softball | 3 | Fri Apr 13, 2007 03:31am |
Foul B1 , T on coach, another T and coach exits | jritchie | Basketball | 15 | Wed Nov 08, 2006 09:02pm |
Coach goes off | Forksref | Basketball | 5 | Sat Jan 07, 2006 01:42pm |
Coach/Ref | hab_in_exile | General / Off-Topic | 3 | Sat Mar 15, 2003 09:32pm |