Quote:
Originally posted by JeffRef
Let's take this to an even higher level of improbability...
So B1 violates and A calls time out. So we know that A1 gets a substitute throw if he misses. Before the ball becomes live for A1's first throw, A2 is assesed with a direct tecnical foul. After B shoots two free throws, they decide they want a time out. I could go on with other interruptions but you see where I'm going with this, right? It could be 5 minutes before A1 gets to shoot his original free throw. He misses. We give him a substitute throw. Coach B wants an explanation: "Sure coach, don't you remember 5 minutes ago when your player violated on A1's free throw and then he called a time out instead of taking the free throw?"
Jamie, maybe this will be on next year's test. And yes it is "double secret probation"
|
Look at it this way.I don't think anything can come between you having to call the delayed B1 violation and awarding a substitute throw if the FT is missed,except an A violation of some kind on the FT.Time lapse doesn't matter.
[Edited by Jurassic Referee on Dec 5th, 2001 at 02:14 PM]