The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 10 votes, 3.80 average. Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 07:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Jeez, DJ, your M's are killing me! Dice-K pitches outstanding ball for 8 innings and the offense can't score any runs. 3 game sweep. UGH! Manny and Papi combined to go 0-fer-10. Ouch. Veritek threw in an 0-fer-4 for good measure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie
As a Ranger fan, I rarely look at the standings past mid April. Who are some of the division leaders?
Some? Here's all of them:

AL East: Red Sox by 9 games over Toronto
AL Central: Detroit by a half game over Cleveland
AL West: LA Angels of Anaheim by 5 over Seattle

NL East: Mets by 3.5 over Philly and Atlanta
NL Central: Milwaukee by 7.5 over the Cubbies
NL West: San Diego and Arizona are tied, a half game in front of the Dodgers.

Aggie, your Rangers are 16 games out. But as I noted in last year's thread, the last two teams to have fired Buck Showalter have won the World Series the very next year (Yankees did it with Torre, Diamondbacks did it with Bochy as manager). So take heart, your Rangers will upset my Red Sox in the ALCS and win the World Series.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!

Last edited by ChuckElias; Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 07:58am.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 09:14am
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckElias
AL East: Red Sox by 9 games over Toronto
We're finally over the 500 mark! W00t!
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 09:22am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckElias
So take heart, your Rangers will upset my Red Sox in the ALCS and win the World Series.
Rangers are certainly having their way with Detroit.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 09:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick
Rangers are certainly having their way with Detroit.
Especially last night - Detroit didn't even bother to take the field from what I understand.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 09:37am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy
Especially last night - Detroit didn't even bother to take the field from what I understand.
And further, they rescheduled the game for September so they may have time to get in a little more fielding and bullpen work.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 09:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick
And further, they rescheduled the game for September so they may have time to get in a little more fielding and bullpen work.
I'm not sure Detroit needs the work as much as some other teams, though.

Last night sure made us old guys feel good - there were 7 pitchers scheduled to start who were over the age of 40: Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, Clemens, Moyer, Williams, and Rogers. Only Mother Nature kept Kenny Rogers from getting to start.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 10:02am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick
Rangers are certainly having their way with Detroit.
Don't feel bad. Two different leagues are having their way with the Yankees.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 02:40pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Factoid:

The Chef just lined one to Jack City.
386 ' in 3.5 sec = 75.2 mph
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 02:49pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick
Factoid:

The Chef just lined one to Jack City.
386 ' in 3.5 sec = 75.2 mph
Emeril Lagasse? Bobby Flay?

Frank Thomas?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 02:54pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Emeril Lagasse? Bobby Flay?

Frank Thomas?

Quite a few Tiger fans wearing #3 Chefs' hats at Comerica.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 03:01pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick

Quite a few Tiger fans wearing #3 Chefs' hats at Comerica.
Sheffield?

We may have made a mistake there. We mighta got rid of the wrong 'roid monster. How about Giambi for Sheffield? Sound like a deal?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 03:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick
Factoid:

The Chef just lined one to Jack City.
386 ' in 3.5 sec = 75.2 mph
You might want to check your calculations, Mick. I'm guessing the 386' distance is as the crow flies. Since most homeruns will travel in a parabolic arc, the ball actually travelled further than 386 feet and was going faster than 75.2 MPH.

- Mr. Annoying Ex-Physics Teacher Guy
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 03:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Dexter
You might want to check your calculations, Mick. I'm guessing the 386' distance is as the crow flies. Since most homeruns will travel in a parabolic arc, the ball actually travelled further than 386 feet and was going faster than 75.2 MPH.

- Mr. Annoying Ex-Physics Teacher Guy
I've seen some of Sheffield's home runs - there may not have been any arc.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)

Last edited by M&M Guy; Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 03:31pm.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2007, 03:30pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Dexter
You might want to check your calculations, Mick. I'm guessing the 386' distance is as the crow flies. Since most homeruns will travel in a parabolic arc, the ball actually travelled further than 386 feet and was going faster than 75.2 MPH.

- Mr. Annoying Ex-Physics Teacher Guy

Good call, but then it bounced.
My calculations were correct. Just weren't enough of them.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 30, 2007, 07:01pm
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Dexter
You might want to check your calculations, Mick. I'm guessing the 386' distance is as the crow flies. Since most homeruns will travel in a parabolic arc, the ball actually travelled further than 386 feet and was going faster than 75.2 MPH.

- Mr. Annoying Ex-Physics Teacher Guy
The longest home run I ever saw hit in person was back when I was a kid playing in our city's version of Little League (a Park District league). I was 11 years old and Pete Ward, then with the White Sox, came to our field to put on a clinic. This was in Chicago Heights, where I grew up (physically, not mentally). He hit a ball not only completely out of our park (not too great a feat, actually), but it landed across the highway in the parking lot of a gas station down the road. Later that day, one of the dads (who was in construction) went out and measured it with a tape. He measured it went just over 470 on the fly. BTW - Ward hit it off a relatively slow pitch from one of our teenage coaches. I'll never forget that.
__________________
Yom HaShoah
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WARNING!! Annual Off-Topic Baseball Thread. Esteemed Members BEWARE!! ChuckElias Basketball 1299 Sat Mar 31, 2007 07:58pm
OFF TOPIC THREAD!!! Dueling off topic baseball threads!!! Dan_ref General / Off-Topic 34 Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:15am
WARNING!!! WARNING!! Annual off-topic baseball thread!! ChuckElias Basketball 583 Sat Jan 21, 2006 05:28pm
WARNING!! ANNUAL OFF TOPIC BASEBALL THREAD!!! Dan_ref Basketball 16 Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:32pm
WARNING! Off-topic! Do NOT read if you are at all offended by baseball threads!! ChuckElias Basketball 508 Tue Nov 09, 2004 09:51pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1