The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 01:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
NCAA Fun Fanboy Thread

Stanford is being embarrassed by Louisville. The selection committee will take grief over their inclusion.

The other two morning games are good battles. Davidson/MD and BC/TX Tech
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 01:23pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Stanford is being embarrassed by Louisville. The selection committee will take grief over their inclusion.

The other two morning games are good battles. Davidson/MD and BC/TX Tech
Yet Stanford over Louisville was one of the more popular upset picks by the so-called experts.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 01:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,193
Quote:
The selection committee will take grief over their inclusion.
This is nonsense. If Stanford were doing that to Louisville, would you say that Louisville didn't belong?

I'm hardly a Stanford fan (in fact, quite the opposite), but they had no bad losses and some decent wins. I don't know if they were better than those left out, but they were not exactly a surprise tournament pick, in my view. The committee will take some justified heat, but this isn't one place.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 01:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
I disagree. Stanford finished in 6th place in the Pac-10 at 10-8 in league and lost their opening round game in the conference tourney. They only had 18 wins on the year and lost 4 of their final 5 games PRIOR to the NCAA game (which makes it 5 of 6).
Also you say no bad losses???
How about 45-75 to Air Force, which did not make the tournament and 46-62 to Santa Clara, another non-tournament team. These weren't close losses.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 01:47pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie
This is nonsense. If Stanford were doing that to Louisville, would you say that Louisville didn't belong?

I'm hardly a Stanford fan (in fact, quite the opposite), but they had no bad losses and some decent wins. I don't know if they were better than those left out, but they were not exactly a surprise tournament pick, in my view. The committee will take some justified heat, but this isn't one place.
I agree...put Stanford up against a different team in the field and this probably doesn't happen...Louisville is strong at guard where Stanford is not - they rely on the big guys...L'ville pressured the guards and kept them from getting the ball inside - it's more of a kudos to Pitino and his team than a slam on Stanford.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 02:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Jim Burr is working the Wash St. / ORU game.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 02:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
The officials are wearing the blue circular NCAA patch again this year.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 07:53pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Jim Burr is working the Wash St. / ORU game.
He's also an alternate. Whore
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 07:38pm
Aleve Titles to Others
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Westchester of the Southern Conference
Posts: 5,381
Send a message via AIM to 26 Year Gap
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie
This is nonsense. If Stanford were doing that to Louisville, would you say that Louisville didn't belong?

I'm hardly a Stanford fan (in fact, quite the opposite), but they had no bad losses and some decent wins. I don't know if they were better than those left out, but they were not exactly a surprise tournament pick, in my view. The committee will take some justified heat, but this isn't one place.
They had too many losses and not enough wins. Put Stanford against the 6 clubs many thought got snubbed and they probably would be 1-5 or 2-4. Nevada said they were 10-8 in conference. How many of those 10 were against the bottom 5 in the league?
__________________
Never hit a piñata if you see hornets flying out of it.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 07:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap
Nevada said they were 10-8 in conference. How many of those 10 were against the bottom 5 in the league?
5.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 07:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,010
And to elaborate on those 5 wins, those were actually wins against the bottom 4, since Stanford was in fact the #6 team in the league. Which means they also had 5 wins against the top 5 teams in their league.

EDIT: Compare that to Syracuse, who many people felt should have been in with their 23-9 record including 10-6 in the Big East. Of their 10 conference wins, only 2 of those came against the top 5 teams in the league. The other 8 were against the bottom 9 teams in the league, and they also LOST to 3 of those bottom 9 teams.

Last edited by WhistlesAndStripes; Thu Mar 15, 2007 at 08:06pm.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 04:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Stanford is being embarrassed by Louisville. The selection committee will take grief over their inclusion.

The other two morning games are good battles. Davidson/MD and BC/TX Tech
Morning games? Do they not teach you Hoyas how to tell time?
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 08:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Dexter
Morning games? Do they not teach you Hoyas how to tell time?
Don't guess you want to talk about GW do you? They were shellacked by Vandy.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 08:51pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,557
Duke lost. All is right with the world.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 15, 2007, 08:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,628
Dear Duke:



HA-HA !!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ejection of a Parent-Fanboy REFVA Basketball 9 Mon Dec 11, 2006 08:27pm
fanboy observation 26 Year Gap Basketball 13 Thu Mar 16, 2006 08:16am
Message from a fanboy! BktBallRef Basketball 15 Thu Mar 09, 2006 07:09pm
Tossing the Fanboy Coach rainmaker Basketball 29 Thu Dec 09, 2004 08:20pm
Mick's huh Thread {worthy of separate thread} Stat-Man Basketball 1 Sun Nov 07, 2004 06:28pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1