![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Google "significant digits" (you should have learned this in HS science class btw...). But the short answer is 14.0 states we care about tenths (seconds, meters, whatever) because we are able to know the value of the tenths. 14 states we are not able to know the value of the tenths so we go out of our way to ignore them. So the way the rules under discussion are worded we are not to consider 10ths at all.
__________________
9-11-01 http://www.fallenheroesfund.org/fallenheroes/index.php http://www.carydufour.com/marinemoms...llowribbon.jpg |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I understand your point, but I doubt the rulemakers were considering significant digits when they re-wrote the rule this year. I think what they meant was if the shot clock "displays" 14 seconds or less, reset it. But I disagree with you if you want to say that's what the rule actually says now. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Getting back to the thread, shot clocks are accurate to units, ie any measurement smaller than that is not valid. That is a consequence of the fact that 10ths are not available to us and we cannot know where between the integer values the timing device is. As for where the significant digits occur - if this concept was limited to decimals only it would be called significant decimals, not significant digits. Do you think that every measurement is accurate to tenths of units or better?
__________________
9-11-01 http://www.fallenheroesfund.org/fallenheroes/index.php http://www.carydufour.com/marinemoms...llowribbon.jpg |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Scrapper1; Mon Jan 22, 2007 at 11:10am. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
The shot clock is certainly not guaranteed to "measure" anything between 14 and 15. Surely the shot clock exists thru the time between 15 seconds and 14 seconds (as we do) but you have no standing to say the shot clock "measures" that time. And even if it did actually "measure" that time, how do we know what the measurement is? We don't, because 10ths of seconds are not available to us. IOW they are not valid for use in our measurement.
__________________
9-11-01 http://www.fallenheroesfund.org/fallenheroes/index.php http://www.carydufour.com/marinemoms...llowribbon.jpg Last edited by Dan_ref; Mon Jan 22, 2007 at 11:27am. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
This whole discussion would go away if the rule simply said "If the shot clock displays 14 seconds or less, reset it to 15". |
|
|||
|
2-14.6f. When an intentionally kicked ball occurs with 14 seconds or less remaining, set to 15 seconds
2-14.7Stop the timing device and continue time without a reset when play begins under the following circumstances: b. When an intentionally kicked ball occurs with 15 seconds or more remaining; Men's Report...Last season, a rule change was implemented for an intentionally kicked ball that did not require the reset of the shot clock when it showed more than 15 seconds remaining. When 15 or fewer seconds remained, the shot clock was set to 15. To improve its application, the rule now states that when 14 or fewer seconds remain on the shot clock, it will be set to 15 seconds. Furthermore, when the intentional kick occurs with 15 or more seconds, there shall be no reset of the shot clock. Nowhere in the NCAA rulebook is there mention of 10th's or 100ths of second in reference to the shot clock. If you see 14 reset it to 15, if says 15 or higher, don't reset it. Please, do not purposely clog a drain just to show off your plumbing skills.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Some clarification of NCAA kick play | ljudge | Football | 2 | Wed Oct 25, 2006 09:06pm |
| NCAA rule clarification... | ckrumm24 | Basketball | 7 | Sun Mar 12, 2006 02:59am |
| Clarification needed on Encroachment vs Ilegal Motion | WyMike | Football | 17 | Tue Sep 14, 2004 09:17pm |
| Clarification needed | Paul LeBoutillier | Basketball | 5 | Sun Jan 27, 2002 01:43am |
| Clarification Needed..... | whiskers_ump | Softball | 2 | Mon Jun 04, 2001 10:40am |