The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 17, 2007, 02:18pm
kmw kmw is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 66
I stand behind the no t...

After reading all the posts and reading the case play (thanks juraissic ), it was clearly a charge. The defense came over and was planted prior to A1 leaving his feet and charging. I know that the coach was working my limits and seeing what was my response. Based on his comment, he knows it was the correct call, I think he was looking to see what kind of comeback comment I would have made. I personally like the "a varsity coach wouldn't ask that" and the "a varsity player wouldn't have done that". A varsity player would have stopped and taken the bunny shot...I stand by my comment of "its a charge and thats why I called it that way". As for rehashing this scenario, I am more peeved at myself for not having the quicker wit. The only other thought to add is that I am a woman officiating a mens game and before they will score me in the top 40 boys rank in my association, they need to know what will bother me. I am a varsity official whether it be boys or girls....
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 17, 2007, 02:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmw
I personally like the "a varsity coach wouldn't ask that" and the "a varsity player wouldn't have done that".
If you're going to use something like these, I might suggest "A varsity official wouldn't have to" -- in my mind, at least, there's a subtle difference that takes some of the "accusation" of the player / coach out of the saying.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 17, 2007, 02:56pm
kmw kmw is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 66
You're right...

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
If you're going to use something like these, I might suggest "A varsity official wouldn't have to" -- in my mind, at least, there's a subtle difference that takes some of the "accusation" of the player / coach out of the saying.

The subtle word changes can make a world of difference...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 17, 2007, 04:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 893
Quote:
Wow. You would rather T him for a coaching box infraction than for calling you a **cking ***hole?
He didn't call me a F***ing A**hole, he said, " it's a good thing HE didn't call you a F***ing A**Hole" Subtle difference and yes, I think I could have "T"ed him up for that, but I knew he would cross the line in a matter of time. He was getting his butt kicked by a team that wasn't even in his class. ( his team was ranked in the top 5, the other team not in the top 10 ( or 20 for that matter )
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 17, 2007, 06:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 696
2004 POI:
The committee is concerned about the use of inappropriate language by players, bench personnel, coaches, officials and spectators. Each group has a responsibility to the game and to each other to demonstrate civility and citizenship.

The team huddle is not a safe haven for coaches' bad language. Players are not permitted to "let off steam" by using profanity, even if it is not directed at an opponent or official. Being angry at oneself is no excuse. Officials are not exempt either. Inappropriate references to players or coaches are not acceptable. Game administrators must also pay particular attention to fans. A game ticket is not a license to abuse.
__________________
"Sports do not build character. They reveal it" - Heywood H. Broun
"Officiating does not build character. It reveal's it" - Ref Daddy
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 18, 2007, 08:38am
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrapins Fan
He didn't call me a F***ing A**hole, he said, " it's a good thing HE didn't call you a F***ing A**Hole"
Same thing. He's telling you that you're a "farging icehole", but he's glad that the coach didn't tell you that you were. Kind of like:

Coach: Hey ref, can you T me up for something that I think?
Ref: No, Coach.
Coach: Good. Because I think you suck.

Quote:
I could have "T"ed him up for that, but I knew he would cross the line in a matter of time.
He already crossed the line. And big time, too. Not just standing outside the coaching box. He just called you fargin icehole -- to your face!!! What the heck line were you waiting for?

I don't know your experience or the area you're from. And I don't mean any of my comments to be taken personally. But from an officiating POV, I can't imagine NOT pulling the trigger on that comment. As I said in a previous post, I can't imagine that your assignor would not back you up on that call.

Quote:
He was getting his butt kicked by a team that wasn't even in his class. ( his team was ranked in the top 5, the other team not in the top 10 ( or 20 for that matter )
This is not at all relevant, IMO. Up by 2, down by 50, you call me a fargin icehole to my face, and your night is probably done.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The 3 versus 2 fallacies, a mini-rant - "Part deux" imaref Basketball 6 Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:39am
Why "general" and "additional"? Back In The Saddle Basketball 1 Sat Oct 07, 2006 02:56pm
"Balk" or "Ball" johnnyg08 Baseball 9 Fri Aug 18, 2006 08:26am
2007 NFHS Rules Changes - "Step and Reach" Dakota Softball 8 Mon Jul 10, 2006 02:46pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1