Eyepoke

[armymanjones]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

The difference is there's no evidence of the double dribble after the fact. The other difference is no one is suggesting you call the foul if you didn't at least see the swipe around the face. All we're saying is you don't to see the finger in the eye to call this foul, seeing the swipe is enough.

I agree seeing the swipe is enough but if you don't at least see the swipe and only the player holding his eye you can't call it.

[armymanjones]

I am watching KSU vs Xavier and saw the same play, a player gettting poked on a rebound. The kid went down with the ball the lead stopped the clock and waited for the kid to see if he could continue. He could not and was removed but no foul was called. The camera of course caught the poke but not the refs. Good no call.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by armymanjones

I am watching KSU vs Xavier and saw the same play, a player gettting poked on a rebound. The kid went down with the ball the lead stopped the clock and waited for the kid to see if he could continue. He could not and was removed but no foul was called. The camera of course caught the poke but not the refs. Good no call.

Great no call -- kid gets poked in the eye and nothing is called.

Looks like Old School has a friend.

[armymanjones]

Originally Posted by Rich Fronheiser

Great no call -- kid gets poked in the eye and nothing is called.

Looks like Old School has a friend.

So RF who do you call the foul on? Do you just tag the closest person?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by armymanjones

So RF who do you call the foul on? Do you just tag the closest person?

That's not the point. You said that it was was a "good no-call". It was actually a missed foul call. There's a big difference between those two. A missed foul call is never a good no-call.

[armymanjones]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

That's not the point. You said that it was was a "good no-call". It was actually a missed foul call. There's a big difference between those two. A missed foul call is never a good no-call.

ok if it was missed do you compound it by calling it on who you think caused the foul?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by armymanjones

ok if it was missed do you compound it by calling it on who you think caused the foul?

I don't personally, and I also personally don't recommend doing so.

If I am sure of who caused the foul, I will call it.