Eyepoke

[armymanjones]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

The difference is there's no evidence of the double dribble after the fact. The other difference is no one is suggesting you call the foul if you didn't at least see the swipe around the face. All we're saying is you don't to see the finger in the eye to call this foul, seeing the swipe is enough.

I agree seeing the swipe is enough but if you don't at least see the swipe and only the player holding his eye you can't call it.