The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 22, 2006, 12:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 56
concerned and curious

I think I have heard this before, but, I do not remember the final results on how to handle this situation.

NFHS game I was observing/evaluating

A1 scores on a driving layup with 5 seconds remaining in a close contest, he falls to the floor under the basket as B1 retrieves the ball from the basket net and tries to get out of bounds for the throw-in. Without ever establishing out-of-bounds status he (B1) throws the ball to B2 and B2 dribbles down the floor. With 2.1 seconds remaining on the clock the official realizes that B1 was never out-of-bounds, and blows his whistle. The official gives the ball to team A stating that B1 had a lane violation.
The official questioned me on the status and what should have been done.

1. Maybe continue to count a 5 second until the violation.
2. Blow and stop immediately until A1 gets up from the floor.
3. Exactly as he handled it.

Your thoughts
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 22, 2006, 12:05pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
There was a thread concerning something similar to this scenario. Don't have time to do a search right now.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 22, 2006, 12:16pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,604
Quote:
Originally Posted by observer
I think I have heard this before, but, I do not remember the final results on how to handle this situation.

1. Maybe continue to count a 5 second until the violation.
2. Blow and stop immediately until A1 gets up from the floor.
3. Exactly as he handled it.
4. Blow the whistle immediately and call a throw-in violation on B1.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 22, 2006, 12:21pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
This is a throwin violation as soon as B1 starts up the court without having taken the ball out for a throwin. I believe there was a case play added recently to cover this scenario, but i don't have my casebook with me.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 22, 2006, 12:22pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
4. Blow the whistle immediately and call a throw-in violation on B1.
Which is the same as #3.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 22, 2006, 12:26pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
Which is the same as #3.
I didn't think so when I originally read it. There were several dribbles before the official called the violation and almost 3 seconds ran off the clock. The violation should be called when the illegal throw-in is released. That's what I was getting at. Sorry for any confusion.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 22, 2006, 12:36pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
I figured, but the official called it as soon as he recognized it; which is all we can ask.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 22, 2006, 01:49pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
This is a throwin violation as soon as B1 starts up the court without having taken the ball out for a throwin. I believe there was a case play added recently to cover this scenario, but i don't have my casebook with me.
You are wise beyond your years.

Casebook play 9.2.2SitC.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 22, 2006, 01:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 201
Basically identical play happened in the Southern Illinois-Indiana game Sunday. SIU never gets OB status, but passes, and heads up court. Ted Hillary kills the play after a couple dribbles, and gives it back to SIU to inbound again.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 22, 2006, 03:56pm
PYRef
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse James
Basically identical play happened in the Southern Illinois-Indiana game Sunday. SIU never gets OB status, but passes, and heads up court. Ted Hillary kills the play after a couple dribbles, and gives it back to SIU to inbound again.

So in this case, Hillary was incorrect to give the ball back to SIU? From 9.2.2 Sit C above, it is a violation and the ball should go to Indiana right?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 22, 2006, 04:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by PYRef
So in this case, Hillary was incorrect to give the ball back to SIU? From 9.2.2 Sit C above, it is a violation and the ball should go to Indiana right?
I don't know if the NCAA has the same case play. Before the FED issued a case play, there was a long discussion here about the right ruling. The options included (a) immediate violation, (b) wait 5 seconds then call a violation, (c) give the ball back.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 22, 2006, 09:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Also, OP should note that this is not a "lane violation" but a "throw-in violation." Just a minor point.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 23, 2006, 08:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
I don't know if the NCAA has the same case play. Before the FED issued a case play, there was a long discussion here about the right ruling. The options included (a) immediate violation, (b) wait 5 seconds then call a violation, (c) give the ball back.
I'm guessing that the rationale for (b) is that the throw-in team has 5 seconds to accomplish the throw-in correctly. So if they miffed it, they could try again. Is that right, Bob?

Only clue they'd have that they'd miffed it would be that you're still counting. But of course they expect you to be counting the 10-sec backcourt count, so they probably wouldn't know. I can see why NFHS opted otherwise.

I call this differently depending on level: for HS games, it's a violation (per rule and case book play); for little kids I make 'em do it right (teaching moment).
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just curious:-))) msrock1954 Softball 8 Sun Apr 16, 2006 09:45am
I am curious rotationslim Basketball 9 Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:17pm
I'm curious eventnyc Basketball 23 Thu Feb 24, 2005 02:46pm
I'm curious----------- SWFLguy Football 1 Mon Oct 21, 2002 09:21pm
curious kman Baseball 5 Mon Jun 10, 2002 02:02am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1