Quiz question

[Raymond]

A-1’s try for goal near the three-point line is successful. The official signals a three-point goal. As Team B is advancing the ball up the court, the coach from Team B is at the table requesting a conference with the official in order to rectify a correctable error. B-1 now tries for goal near the three-point line, and the official rules this a two-point try. Team B coach appeals both rulings. After reviewing the plays on the courtside monitor, it is determined that the coach is wrong on both appeals. The referee charges Team B with two timeouts. Is the official correct?

By my meager research I answered true per 5-1-22; A.R. 130, but I cannot find anything that specifically addresses 2 errors being corrected during the same review period.

NCAA

A.R. 130. Team A coach requests a timeout for an official to assess whether a correctable
error has occurred. The error is (a) correctable or; (b) not correctable. RULING:
In (a) when the error is correctable, no timeout shall be charged to Team A. In
(b) when the error is not correctable, a timeout shall be charged to Team A. When any
portion of that timeout remains after the review of the request has been conducted,
Team A shall be entitled to use that time. When the review requires the length of a
timeout or longer, play shall resume immediately from the point at which it was interrupted
at a designated spot.

I would think only one conference, only one timeout. The number of contested calls is not addressed