Referee Magazine - November 2006

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by ref18

Back when I subscribed, for 2 months of the year they sent us the NASO edition as a trial. The only advantage that NASO has is the insurance. I didn't find the NASO inset useful.

I usually don't get the NASO edition. As ref18 stated, they do these trial runs and that why I got it.

But yeah, they weren't even close on the ruling... wow!

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by tjones1

I usually don't get the NASO edition. As ref18 stated, they do these trial runs and that why I got it.

But yeah, they weren't even close on the ruling... wow!

That might explain it. They may have just been sending you an old example of what the NASO insert looks like. Those could have been leftovers from prior issues a couple of years ago.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

That might explain it. They may have just been sending you an old example of what the NASO insert looks like. Those could have been leftovers from prior issues a couple of years ago.

Hmm, I don't know. It'd seem like a lot of extra work. Plus the very first page (N1) says "November 2006 Report." Looks like they just really messed it up.

[Nevadaref]

Ok, now I'm reduced to surmising that they prepared this play ruling a while back and just got around to using it now, but failed to check it against recent rule changes.

However the goof occurred, it is very sloppy on the editor's part.