Quote:
Originally posted by Texas Aggie
I don't believe timeouts fall under "activity" and would be cancelled. Whatever is done in the lane for the free throw, no one gets the benefit of it, but if they take a time out, they get the benefit of the rest and conference with the coach.
|
So your reasoning is that since someone benefits from the activity, then it shouldn't be cancelled?
1. How can you support that by the rules?
2. Didn't both teams derive, or have the equal opportunity to derive, the same benefit from any time-out period occuring? So what advantage did one side gain over the other that makes you worry about cancelling the time-out?
Sun Feb 12, 2006, 02:33am
Hybrid Mode
