Furthermore, situation #6 from the 2004-05 interps actually became case book play 7.5.7 situation D that same season replacing the previous ruling which was:
7.5.7 SITUATION D: Team A scores a field goal. B1 picks up the ball and steps out of bounds at the end line to prepare for a throw-in. Before the throw-in is completed, A2 is called for an intentional (or flagrant) foul on B3 near the end line. RULING: B3 would shoot the two free throws for the intentional (or flagrant) foul with the lane cleared. Team B will be permitted to run the end line on the ensuing throw-in. (7-5-11)
Could it be any clearer that the NFHS purposely chose to take away the running privilege on noncommon fouls?
|