|
|||
Re: why would the rule on
Quote:
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
Re: Re: why would the rule on
Quote:
POI means exactly that, continue from the point the game was interrupted. To give A the throw-in but take away A's ability to run the line is NOT POI.
__________________
9-11-01 http://www.fallenheroesfund.org/fallenheroes/index.php http://www.carydufour.com/marinemoms...llowribbon.jpg |
|
|||
I'm with NevadaRef on this. I think the Fed should look at how POI interacts with running the baseline in this case. If they allowed A to retain the right to run the baseline, I think that would be truer to the notion of POI.
But as it stands, the rule on retaining the run is very specific about only in the case of a common foul. This, I believe was a change they made just a couple of years ago? At the time they made it clear that their intent was only common fouls allow a team to retain the baseline.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
|
|||
Quote:
The wording of 7-5-7 does not read at all on the rules related to how we handle double fouls.
__________________
9-11-01 http://www.fallenheroesfund.org/fallenheroes/index.php http://www.carydufour.com/marinemoms...llowribbon.jpg |
|
|||
Just to add to the discussion, if I may.
When do you go to AP on a double foul? * During a try for goal and/or rebound. * During a jump ball. ...any other time? Also... During a Team A throw-in...A2 fouls B1. Team A has 7 team fouls. Does B1 shoot the bonus FTs or go to "POI"? Why or why not.
__________________
Dan Ivey Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA) Member since 1989 Richland, WA |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
Re: Re: no possession arrow
Quote:
JugglingReferee answered it correctly...is this what you meant about no team control on a throw-in, IREFU2?
__________________
Dan Ivey Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA) Member since 1989 Richland, WA |
|
|||
Quote:
7-5-7 either excludes the possibility of retaining the privilege of running the baseline for non-common fouls, or it only addresses the very narrow topic of retaining the privilege after a common foul by the scoring team and is irrelevant to and thus silent on other types of fouls. It could be read either way. Points for not retaining the run
Points for retaining the run
Unless somebody can point out a fatal flaw in one of my lists, I think this one needs to go on Nevada's list of things we'd like the Fed to clarify. [Edited by back in the saddle on Jan 21st, 2006 at 09:29 PM]
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Certainly some clarification is in order from the NFHS. But I'd bet a game fee that if something does come down, Team A will lose the right to run the end line.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
Quote:
However, if the inbounding team loses the ability to run the endline after a double foul, then team B still gets an advantage from double foul. By the FED's own rationale, they should keep the endline; but in order to stay consistent with the "common foul" clause that we've been debating, I would bet that the official interp will be that the inbounding team loses the right to run.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
Quote:
However, if the inbounding team loses the ability to run the endline after a double foul, then team B still gets an advantage from double foul. [/B][/QUOTE]Agree with Dan and Chuck. Common sense would seem to imply that the throwing team shouldn't be disadvantaged by losing their original right to run the endline. That would be penalizing the throwing team twice while only penalizing the defensive team once. That's illogical. But if it happens in the last 5 seconds of a quarter..... |
Bookmarks |
|
|