Tue Jan 17, 2006, 05:34am
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,144
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Because it is a silly rule.
The team should lose the arrow if it fouls OR violates during the AP throw-in. Just my silly opinion. 
The current rationale is that an AP throw-in ends when the ball is touched inbounds or the throwing team violates. Since the arrow is reversed when the throw-in ends, we have a change for a violation.
|
Nope, the current rationale is that you don't penalize a team twice if it commits a foul or violation. Each act carries it's own separate penalty. Adding an AP loss is double jeopardy.
Thinking otherwise is silly, thilly. Really.
|
JR:
Well said. Keep up the good work.
MTD, Sr.
|
I hope you're joking. 
|
Joking about what?
MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
|
Threaded Mode
