Tue Jan 17, 2006, 05:15am
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Because it is a silly rule.
The team should lose the arrow if it fouls OR violates during the AP throw-in. Just my silly opinion. 
The current rationale is that an AP throw-in ends when the ball is touched inbounds or the throwing team violates. Since the arrow is reversed when the throw-in ends, we have a change for a violation.
|
Nope, the current rationale is that you don't penalize a team twice if it commits a foul or violation. Each act carries it's own separate penalty. Adding an AP loss is double jeopardy.
Thinking otherwise is silly, thilly. Really.
|
JR:
Well said. Keep up the good work.
MTD, Sr.
|
I hope you're joking. 
|