The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Dunking in warmups (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/23876-dunking-warmups.html)

rainmaker Thu Dec 29, 2005 06:53am

Quote:

Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:

Originally posted by cdaref
Yeah, there is sort of a hoops urban legend (might be true) that three players who didnt like their coach and knew they were going to get DNPs and/or cut dunked three times during warm ups and got their coach ejected. Hard to say if it is true. But that is the story. Some real senior guys might know if this is true or not.
This did happen just 2-3 years ago in the Portland area.

Details?

Camron Rust Thu Dec 29, 2005 03:36pm

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:

Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:

Originally posted by cdaref
Yeah, there is sort of a hoops urban legend (might be true) that three players who didnt like their coach and knew they were going to get DNPs and/or cut dunked three times during warm ups and got their coach ejected. Hard to say if it is true. But that is the story. Some real senior guys might know if this is true or not.
This did happen just 2-3 years ago in the Portland area.

Details?

I don't recall the details but I think it was a Boys JV or Freshman game at Lake Oswego or Lakeridge (or one of the schools in that area). Three different players either dunked or hung on the rim in pregame and got the coach tossed.

refnrev Thu Dec 29, 2005 05:20pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Ref Daddy
Quote:

Originally posted by Mark Dexter
Quote:

Originally posted by fonzzy07
Question. If i call this T for dunking in warm ups does that mean their will be no jump ball. If I understand the rule correctly we begin the game with 2 shots and then the ball is given to the shooting team at half court just as with anyother T
And if 3 kids do it, the coach is ejected.

Is that correct? Three incidents and your out? Rule book reference please.

__________________________________________________ ______

Ref Daddy,
The rules reference was posted above, but also check out the technical foul page in the rule book that shows what, how, and to whom. A really helpful page to get to know very well. RR

wwcfoa43 Sat Dec 31, 2005 01:19am

Quote:

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:

Originally posted by johnnyrao
I have also been told by some pretty experienced officials in my area that, using this criteria, if a player lays it over the hoop it is good preventive officiating to let him know that if the rim moves it's a T.

The problem is that there's absolutely no rules basis to support that particular hypothesis. What's your answer gonna be if someone asks you for a rules reference to back up your statement?

The rim vibrating might not be a bad rule of thumb to use, but I don't think that it's a good idea to tell a coach anything that can't be backed up by some rules language. Just tell the coach that it either was or wasn't a dunk.

I think the rim vibrating is a pretty good interpretation of the rule. The rule states "Dunking or stuffing is the driving, forcing, pushing or attempting to force..." So if you place the ball above the hoop and allow gravity to do the work then you are not creating the "force". Now you could force the ball through without causing the ring to move but then it is difficult to tell if the force was caused by you or by simple gravity. If the ring moves then this provides some good evidence of the force since the ball and gravity alone (from a short distance) will not likely cause the ring to move.

Conclusion: (a) Ring does not move = benefit of doubt given to player that they provided no force.

(b) Ring moves = little doubt that player provided force.


Jurassic Referee Sat Dec 31, 2005 04:14am

Quote:

Originally posted by wwcfoa43
Quote:

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:

Originally posted by johnnyrao
I have also been told by some pretty experienced officials in my area that, using this criteria, if a player lays it over the hoop it is good preventive officiating to let him know that if the rim moves it's a T.

The problem is that there's absolutely no rules basis to support that particular hypothesis. What's your answer gonna be if someone asks you for a rules reference to back up your statement?

The rim vibrating might not be a bad rule of thumb to use, but I don't think that it's a good idea to tell a coach anything that can't be backed up by some rules language. Just tell the coach that it either was or wasn't a dunk.

I think the rim vibrating is a pretty good interpretation of the rule. The rule states "Dunking or stuffing is the driving, forcing, pushing or attempting to force..." So if you place the ball above the hoop and allow gravity to do the work then you are not creating the "force". Now you could force the ball through without causing the ring to move but then it is difficult to tell if the force was caused by you or by simple gravity. If the ring moves then this provides some good evidence of the force since the ball and gravity alone (from a short distance) will not likely cause the ring to move.

Conclusion: (a) Ring does not move = benefit of doubt given to player that they provided no force.

(b) Ring moves = little doubt that player provided force.


Problem = You have absolutely no rules language to back that little fantasy up.

Why do people take a simple rule and make up their <b>own</b> interpretation for it?

The "rim vibrating" is <b>not</b> mentioned anywhere in the rules as being a criteria or a possible criteria of a dunk. It's that simple. Are you telling me that if you simply drop the ball from above and it hits the ring first and then slops in or drops out, you're still gonna call that play a dunk because the ring moved? If a player takes a jump shot and rattles the ring, is that a "T" too?

Call it any way you want. Have fun trying to explain it later though if someone questions you. You won't find any rules language to support your hypothesis.

[Edited by Jurassic Referee on Dec 31st, 2005 at 08:30 AM]

Nevadaref Sat Dec 31, 2005 06:16am

Wouldn't it be better to just use the wording of the definition instead of designing these other criteria to follow?

It seems that officials have way to many "I use such and such to decide if..." when the clear language of the rules would do just fine.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1