|
|||
From the test. "It is a technical foul whenever bench personnel are standing with the clock is running."
This is true and false as we know there are times when it is not a technical. So what is the fed looking for here? I feel it is false as the question says "whenever" because that would lead to thinking that it is a technical period. Am I reading into this??
__________________
Jim Need an out, get an out. Need a run, balk it in. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
Quote:
"...with the clock is running." Isn't that a grammatical mistake?
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
Quote:
Uh, anyway, this is an example of one of the convoluted Fed. questions that manages to confuse many. I would answer false, just because there is a time bench personnel may stand, and that is to react to a good play. If they were to re-word the question to "It is a technical foul every time bench personnel are standing...", then it might make the question a little easier.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
The reason that question is on there is that an editorial change was made to the coaches' rule this season:
10-4-4 New, 10-5: A new article was added to 10-4 clarifying when bench personnel may stand. Section 10-5 was reorganized to clarify the head coaches' rule. The NFHS wants to make sure that everyone got the message. The question is purposely over-inclusive to emphasize that there ARE times when the bench personnel MAY stand. [Edited by Nevadaref on Oct 11th, 2005 at 02:06 AM] |
|
|||
I honestly do not understand why this question was so difficult. It is obviously NOT a T whenever bench personnel stand, only in some cases. I think the question is very simple.
__________________
"Contact does not mean a foul, a foul means contact." -Me |
Bookmarks |
|
|