Wed Aug 10, 2005, 12:03pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,592
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Just my warped, legalistic opinion. 
|
I'm tending to agree with your interpretation here, Nevada (although I'd lean heavily toward calling disconcertion in these type situations), however, I want to pose a hypothetical question.
A1 is shooting FT's, and B1 is along the lane line. B1 is also (for some odd reason) a world champion gymnast. B1 plants his hands in the lane, moves his body forward, and does a horizontal handstand (supporting his body horizontally) with his feet above the marked lane space (not penetrating the plane).
If there were no prohibition for disconcertion, would you call this a violation?
|
I would say that it depends if he's wearing those pants with the stirrups around his feet.
__________________
Do you ever feel like your stuff strutted off without you?
|
Threaded Mode
