The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 18, 2005, 10:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,628
The bottom line is the Spurs didn't show up to play.

The Pistons played aggressive, hard, good defense. Was there contact let go? Yup. On both ends of the floor. The fouls were almost dead even - so it's not like the officials were nailing one team and not the other.

SA, most notably Tim Duncan and Ginobili (who's obviously playing hurt) played with zero emotion, passion, and joy. Rather than get mad when Detroit started whupping their a**es, they just let it happen. Popovich himself said it was the worst playoff performance in NBA history.

NBA refereeing is supposed to be the pinnacle of "advantage/disadvantage" officiating - and I think Game Four was a good demonstration of that.
__________________
HOMER: Just gimme my gun.
CLERK: Hold on, the law requires a five-day waiting period; we've got run a background check...
HOMER: Five days???? But I'm mad NOW!!
  #47 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 18, 2005, 10:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1
I understand the is difficult to support any conspiracy theory, but for me is clear that Miami series against Detroit and the 2 first games in San Antonio, were officiated in a way that could help people start talking about it.

I always say that when referees are doing their job, they past unnoticed, and of course this has not been the case. The sports is about players not referees, so if they make the right calls and understand that the stars are the players, we shouldn’t be talking about them.

Terrible understanding of a charge foul and a blocking foul has been the common mistake that I has seen.

and YES It’s mental, and frustration because of bad calls is common in good and bad players. Good players will overcome from that but it could cost you a couple of games and in a series of 7, referees should be doing a better job. Everybody makes mistakes but, are you agree about referees making frequently mistakes and everybody have to remain quiet (this doesn’t happens in our regular jobs?)

Regards,

antiref
  #48 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 18, 2005, 11:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally posted by antiref
referees should be doing a better job.
Buddy,
You come in here with a name that suggests you are against referees and then start spouting off some mumbo jumbo crap that a third grader could have written better...what kind of responses do you expect to hear my friend?

Edit: BTW...mick...feel free to delete my post right along with this dyspeptic antiref.

[Edited by RookieDude on Jun 19th, 2005 at 03:32 AM]
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
  #49 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 19, 2005, 12:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by antiref
I always say ...
And you are...

....who?
  #50 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 19, 2005, 02:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9
Wasn't me. I don't consider myself anti-ref. Unless it's a Ed Hightower discussion.
  #51 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 19, 2005, 02:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9
While I'm still here...

Can I ask (of officials) who watched the first four games of this past series.

In your opinions, were the first 2 games in San Antonio officiated different than the 2 in Detroit? If so, why?

LB
  #52 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 19, 2005, 03:08am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by antiref
I understand the is difficult to support any conspiracy theory, but for me is clear that Miami series against Detroit and the 2 first games in San Antonio, were officiated in a way that could help people start talking about it.

I always say that when referees are doing their job, they past unnoticed, and of course this has not been the case. The sports is about players not referees, so if they make the right calls and understand that the stars are the players, we shouldn’t be talking about them.

Terrible understanding of a charge foul and a blocking foul has been the common mistake that I has seen.

and YES It’s mental, and frustration because of bad calls is common in good and bad players. Good players will overcome from that but it could cost you a couple of games and in a series of 7, referees should be doing a better job. Everybody makes mistakes but, are you agree about referees making frequently mistakes and everybody have to remain quiet (this doesn’t happens in our regular jobs?)

Regards,

antiref
Well, a Detroit fanboy shows up. Usually they don't slither into our sight when their team has just won a few games.I kinda expected at this time of this series that it would been a SA fanboy instead showing up with the usual mindless crap.

Care to tell us about your vast knowledge of the block/charge rule that allows you to make such a judgement? How many games have you actually officiated and at what levels?

Yes, the officials are out to get YOUR team!

No, it doesn't really matter which team is your's. The referees are still out to get them.

That pretty much cover it for you, fanboy?

Soon to be gone forever. Lah me.

Regards, Anti-antiref.
  #53 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 19, 2005, 03:09am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by LoudBottom
While I'm still here...

Can I ask (of officials) who watched the first four games of this past series.

NO!

Now go away.
  #54 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 19, 2005, 03:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,628
Quote:
Originally posted by LoudBottom
While I'm still here...

Can I ask (of officials) who watched the first four games of this past series.

In your opinions, were the first 2 games in San Antonio officiated different than the 2 in Detroit? If so, why?

LB
Hey....aren't you forgetting something?

Quote:
Originally posted by LoudBottom

Zebraref: "Now go away fanboy."

Done and Done
You could at least live up to your promise....
  #55 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 22, 2005, 08:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
Quote:
Originally posted by drothamel
I don't know, Mark, it may be more of a non-sequitur.

If this board starts going Latin on me, I'm through.
That goes without saying - everything that fanboys say on this board is non sequitur.
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
  #56 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 22, 2005, 08:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Look, you guys can joke about this all you want but it remains a fact that recent studies have found that in virtually every single basketball game ever played using officials one of the two teams lost.

If this aint proof of a vast conspiracy I don't know what is.
Sparky,
Your point is well taken.

With officials, one team will lose.
Without officials, both teams lose.

mick
And with Bud Selig as commissioner, neither team wins . . .
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
  #57 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 22, 2005, 08:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Thumbs down

I can't believe that the moderators of this site will allow a user to post under the name "antiref."

This guy needs to go and in a damn hurry. If he truly wants to discuss officiating, then he should select a more appropriate name and lose the dumbass "ref conspiracy theory."

[Edited by BktBallRef on Jun 22nd, 2005 at 10:00 AM]
  #58 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 22, 2005, 09:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 85
I am not a ref, so disagree if you must, but seeing those types of views can enlighten a referee I would think. Especially someone new to being a ref. It shows that there are people out there so ignorant (Defence for instance) that they come up with these wild ideas about the way a game is being called. Now with that knowledge, you go out there and call the best game you can knowing only half the gym is going to be happy with you.

Also, it makes for some fun reading.

You also realize even NBA refs, supposedly the top of the ref game, get flack, so just call the game as best you can and move on, don't dwell.
  #59 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 22, 2005, 10:48am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
I can't believe that the moderators of this site will allow a user to post under the name "antiref."

This guy needs to go and in a damn hurry. If he truly wants to discuss officiating, then he should select a more appropriate name and lose the dumbass "ref conspiracy theory."
Ouch!
Been hit by a stone thrown from the Research Triangle.
That's gonna leave a mark.
mick

  #60 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 22, 2005, 10:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by antiref
I always say ...
And you are...

....who?
She's Auntie Ref.

Her live in boyfriend Uncle Cletus posts here sometimes.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1