|
||||
Re: Re: Coach K
Quote:
(snappy comeback, eh?) mick |
|
|||
Re: Re: Re: Coach K
Quote:
As for airing them during the NBA Finals, if it's recruiting, it's recruiting. We aren't currently in a dead period. So while I mute the commercial when it comes on for reasons that mick and rainmaker have already stated, I don't see an issue from a recruiting standpoint. He's allowed to recruit at this time. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all." |
|
|||
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Coach K
Quote:
99.9999999+% of all HS varsity players have absolutely zero chance of getting a letter from Duke, let alone getting a look from any Duke assistant coach. Of those who are seriously recruited, how many do you think will make their decision based on some American Express commercial they might have seen on TV?
__________________
9-11-01 http://www.fallenheroesfund.org/fallenheroes/index.php http://www.carydufour.com/marinemoms...llowribbon.jpg |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"Contact does not mean a foul, a foul means contact." -Me |
|
|||
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Coach K
Quote:
|
|
|||
here's your answer
Q: So, if the offensive player drives to the basket, beating his defender and some interior defender comes over to help out, then if contact occurs within the RA, its a block, correct? Is the line part of the RA? Do both feet have to be within the RA? Can the feet be on the line and the player still be considered in the RA?
A: right...if the drive starts outside (above) the lower defensive box (ldb) and the defender (any defender) obtains a legal guarding position outside the restricted area (ra), it is a charge. the line is part of the r.a....according to the rules, if the foot of the defender is on the line of the r.a., it should be considered a defensive foul... if the drive starts below the l.d.b....the defender can take a charge within the r.a....EXACTLY what was called in game 1... |
|
|||
I didn't know ...
Quote:
|
|
|||
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Coach K
Quote:
I don't see it that way and apparently neither does the NCAA.
__________________
9-11-01 http://www.fallenheroesfund.org/fallenheroes/index.php http://www.carydufour.com/marinemoms...llowribbon.jpg |
|
|||
Hmmmm, I didn't know that discussing an issue was "whining about it". I guess we need to get rid of this officiating whining board if that's all we do here.
While it may be silly to you, evidently it's not silly to the dozens of D1 school presidents and athletic directors who have complained to the NCAA about the spots. There's been a great deal of dialogue about it and I don't think that it's over. I see both sides of the debate but personally I couldn't care less about the recruiting aspects. You'll note that I haven't advocated wither side. I'm just discussing the issue. And say what you want about the commercial, it has nothing to do with using a credit card. If that didn't display the AE logo at the end of it, you'd never know it was a credit card spot. The commercial is about Coach K and how successful he and his program have been. Finally, I'm tired of the stupid commercial. |
|
|||
Quote:
And of course the commercial is about the coach, AE is paying him - and others btw - to attach their names to their brand. You wanna be like Coach K, a succesful basketball coach & West Point grad? Use the AE card. Or maybe you wanna be like Robert Deniro, he's a tough guy who lives in downtown NY. Or maybe you just want to be more like Ellen. We don't care, just use our damn card.
__________________
9-11-01 http://www.fallenheroesfund.org/fallenheroes/index.php http://www.carydufour.com/marinemoms...llowribbon.jpg |
|
|||
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Coach K
Quote:
No one watches commercials, especially kids under 18. Plus if they did see it, I suspect they'd be just as annoyed as you were. It might drive some players to NC! Except that no one watches commercials. |
Bookmarks |
|
|