![]() |
If my role as Galactic Emperor extended to making the NF rules for basketball, here's what I would do:
1) No jump to start game - home gets ball to start 1st and 4th, visitors to start 2nd and 3rd. Jump for OT. 2) No one-and-one - on seventh team foul of half, two shots, on tenth team foul, three to make two. 3) No automatic possession on a T. Use POI. 4) Only players on the floor can request a TO. No particular reason except it would piss off the coaches, which is cool. 5) Allow players on the FT lane to go in on the release. The game should be for manly men (and women). 6) No five second closely guarded if player is dribbling. Have the rule only on holding the ball. 7) Eliminate five second closedly guarded and ten second backcourt violation in all games with a shot clock. Eliminate redundancy. 8) End the nonsense of allowing more than one player OOB after a made or awarded score. I've yet to hear a logical reason to allow it. 9) Allow players to play with nipple rings, if they're taped. |
I'm still holding out for the 8 foot rim.
|
Quote:
1) Dumb idea. Jump's a great, dramatic way to begin the contest. I suppose you'd eliminate the opening kickoff from football too, eh? 2) No 1-and-1 - give offended team chance for minimum of two free throws....sounds a lot like FIBA :D 5) I didn't know players on the lane had to wait for rim contact in NFHS...you learn something new every day! 6) No five second count on dribble - a rule modifiation that Canada's been using for years! 9) Something tells me you'd only want this rule so it would be necessary to check. And that you would restrict yourself to working womens' games - in Florida and California. Or Sweden :p |
Better than jump ball
Why not skip the jump ball and do like the XFL. Start with the ball on the floor at midcourt and have two players spring to get control of it. Or how about building a shoot to drop the ball in the middle of the game, kind of like foosball?
|
Re: Better than jump ball
Quote:
|
I just saw the title, and the name of the "Thread Starter" and I called Mary. "Hey, he forget his meds today!!"
|
Re: Re: Better than jump ball
Jumpball is part of the game, not sure what's so bad about it.
Mark, you must be bad at tossing the ball, as the R you should just make the U1 do it instead. |
Re: Re: Re: Better than jump ball
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thanks, Juulie. BTW - I've told Juulie before that my wife doesn't have a very high opinion of men to begin with. Here's three examples: 1) She thinks The Three Stooges movies are documentaries. 2) She says the only reason men walk upright is because 7-11 puts the beer on the top shelf. 3) She has a keychain that says, "Mens are like dogs - dumb but trainable". The only reason she has put up with me all these years is she keeps herself heavily sedated. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
<LI>Why? It works fine as it is. <LI>Why? 1+1 then 2 is a good step..you get some for free and then the price goes up. <LI>Agree <LI>Agree <LI>On the rim works better. Too many HS officials couldn't manage it correctly and there were near bloodbaths under the boards that went uncalled if the ball went in. <LI>Why? It's a team game. Rewards good defense. <LI>It would only be redundant if they were the same length as the shot clock. All work together to force action in different ways. The 10 second count reduces the size of the floor that the defense has to cover to force a turnover. The 5 second count makes it a team game. <LI>Team may make the throwin from anywhere OOB along that line. There is no spot designated nor any thrower designated. Why prohibit it? </OL> |
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Better than jump ball
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Better than jump ball
Quote:
It works really well for me and I can't ever remember having my partner call a re-jump due to a bad toss. However, I once worked with a partner from England who said it really wasn't a good idea to get a reputation as a "tosser". ;) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24am. |