The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 11, 2005, 09:20am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Re: Goal Tend

Quote:
Originally posted by OldCoachNewRef
Could the attempt be goal tended by the defense "after" it hits the floor?

So the answer is yes, it may be goal tended. Basket Interference may be called if ball is in the cylinder or on the rim just like any pass or shot attempt.
That is really not true. Goaltending is different from basket interference to begin with.

Goaltending deals with three things.

1. Ball having a chance to go in.
2. Ball completely above the cylinder
3. Ball on its downward flight.

You cannot have goaltending on plays that are not a shot.

Now you could have basket interference if all the situations take place as listed under 4-6. Most of these involve either touching the net or cylinder while the ball is in the imaginary cylinder. Of course there are a couple of other situations, but goaltending and basket interference is not the same thing.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 11, 2005, 09:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 58
Send a message via AIM to OldCoachNewRef
Wink

Rut,

Isn't that what I said? Goal tending could not be called but Basket Interference could? Why are you saying this is wrong? BTW, the net may be touched while the ball is in the cylinder, but not while it is touching the rim.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 11, 2005, 09:52am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally posted by OldCoachNewRef
Rut,

Isn't that what I said? Goal tending could not be called but Basket Interference could? Why are you saying this is wrong? BTW, the net may be touched while the ball is in the cylinder, but not while it is touching the rim.
I took your comment, "The ball may be goal tended" as wrong. The ball can never be goal tended, because goaltending would not apply. You can only goal tend a shot; this example is not a shot. That is really what I meant by you were wrong on this particular issue.

Your last comment is not true either. The cylinder is the rim for starters. Look at Rule 4-6-1. A player cannot touch the ball or any part of the basket (including the net) while the ball is on or within either basket.

It might sound like semantics, but when you say someone can goal tend, that is just not a true statement.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 11, 2005, 10:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 292
I happily stand corrected that the basket would count as a two. But is my game clock interpretation correct?

Quote:
Originally posted by brainbrian
If the buzzer went off before the bounce:
the ball would become dead as soon as it hit the ground.

If the buzzer went off after the bounce:
The basket would count.

NFHS 6-7-5:
"The ball becomes dead when time expires except while a try for a field goal or a tapped ball by a player toward their basket is in flight."

"Flight" ends when the ball hits the ground.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 11, 2005, 10:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 58
Send a message via AIM to OldCoachNewRef
The try is done once it hits the floor, so even if the clock expires after the bounce, the goal does NOT count (it is dead when the clock runs out).
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 11, 2005, 10:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 292
Ah, it all makes sense. Thanks guys. I was dead wrong and glad I learned the correct interpretation.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 11, 2005, 01:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by OldCoachNewRef
Could the attempt be goal tended by the defense "after" it hits the floor?

So the answer is yes, it may be goal tended. Basket Interference may be called if ball is in the cylinder or on the rim just like any pass or shot attempt.
You just had three posters tell you that the answer was no, yet you still think the answer is yes?

A try cannot be goaltended if it no longer has a chance to go in the basket. Since a try ends when it hits the floor, it's no longer possible to go in the basket or to have GT.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2005, 08:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kaukauna, WI
Posts: 832
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by OldCoachNewRef
Could the attempt be goal tended by the defense "after" it hits the floor?

So the answer is yes, it may be goal tended. Basket Interference may be called if ball is in the cylinder or on the rim just like any pass or shot attempt.
You just had three posters tell you that the answer was no, yet you still think the answer is yes?

A try cannot be goaltended if it no longer has a chance to go in the basket. Since a try ends when it hits the floor, it's no longer possible to go in the basket or to have GT.
Bear with me. Yes, it still might have a chance to go in the basket. Here's the sitch: A1 bounces the ball toward the basket, maybe on a hard bounce pass that nobody catches. It bounces high, kisses the glass and is rolling on the rim. B1 jumps up and pulls the ball off the rim. Would you let B1 yank the ball off the rim because it wasn't a try, or would you call BI?

Here's a second sitch: same deal, high bounce, going toward the rim coming down. B1 taps it out of the air on the way down toward the basket. Goaltend?

I'd say yes to the BI but no the goaltend.
__________________
Quitters never win, winners never quit, but those who never win AND never quit are idiots.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2005, 08:49pm
M.A.S.H.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
For your second sitch I say no because it's not a try or tap.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2005, 08:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by mplagrow
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by OldCoachNewRef
Could the attempt be goal tended by the defense "after" it hits the floor?

So the answer is yes, it may be goal tended. Basket Interference may be called if ball is in the cylinder or on the rim just like any pass or shot attempt.
You just had three posters tell you that the answer was no, yet you still think the answer is yes?

A try cannot be goaltended if it no longer has a chance to go in the basket. Since a try ends when it hits the floor, it's no longer possible to go in the basket or to have GT.
Bear with me. Yes, it still might have a chance to go in the basket. Here's the sitch: A1 bounces the ball toward the basket, maybe on a hard bounce pass that nobody catches. It bounces high, kisses the glass and is rolling on the rim. B1 jumps up and pulls the ball off the rim. Would you let B1 yank the ball off the rim because it wasn't a try, or would you call BI?

Here's a second sitch: same deal, high bounce, going toward the rim coming down. B1 taps it out of the air on the way down toward the basket. Goaltend?

I'd say yes to the BI but no the goaltend.
Yes, it has a chance to go in but it is NOT A TRY. Therefore, it cannot be GT.

BI is not GT and GT is not BI.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2005, 08:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kaukauna, WI
Posts: 832
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by mplagrow
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by OldCoachNewRef
Could the attempt be goal tended by the defense "after" it hits the floor?

So the answer is yes, it may be goal tended. Basket Interference may be called if ball is in the cylinder or on the rim just like any pass or shot attempt.
You just had three posters tell you that the answer was no, yet you still think the answer is yes?

A try cannot be goaltended if it no longer has a chance to go in the basket. Since a try ends when it hits the floor, it's no longer possible to go in the basket or to have GT.
Bear with me. Yes, it still might have a chance to go in the basket. Here's the sitch: A1 bounces the ball toward the basket, maybe on a hard bounce pass that nobody catches. It bounces high, kisses the glass and is rolling on the rim. B1 jumps up and pulls the ball off the rim. Would you let B1 yank the ball off the rim because it wasn't a try, or would you call BI?

Here's a second sitch: same deal, high bounce, going toward the rim coming down. B1 taps it out of the air on the way down toward the basket. Goaltend?

I'd say yes to the BI but no the goaltend.
Yes, it has a chance to go in but it is NOT A TRY. Therefore, it cannot be GT.

BI is not GT and GT is not BI.
That's more or less my point, that in that situation you could call one but not the other.
__________________
Quitters never win, winners never quit, but those who never win AND never quit are idiots.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 13, 2005, 01:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:
Originally posted by OldCoachNewRef
Rut,

Isn't that what I said? Goal tending could not be called but Basket Interference could? Why are you saying this is wrong? BTW, the net may be touched while the ball is in the cylinder, but not while it is touching the rim.
I took your comment, "The ball may be goal tended" as wrong. The ball can never be goal tended, because goaltending would not apply. You can only goal tend a shot; this example is not a shot. That is really what I meant by you were wrong on this particular issue.
While what he said was stated poorly, it was technically correct. A player may tend the goal (legally) in this case. They may not be called for goaltending, however.

Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge

Your last comment is not true either. The cylinder is the rim for starters. Look at Rule 4-6-1. A player cannot touch the ball or any part of the basket (including the net) while the ball is on or within either basket.
His last comment is true. The net or rim may be legally contacted while the ball is in the cylinder but not on the rim. The rim is NOT the same as the cylinder.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1