2005-06 rules changes

[Snake~eyes]

Originally posted by brainbrian

I had a partner call it a violation, no one knew the difference. Then afterwards his teammate told him he couldn't do that. They player said "I know."

I would prefer the violation better.

LOL, You quoted it wrong! I didn't say that!

[brandan89]

I hear their wanting to change the uniform.....


Striped shirt, instead of black pants, going with the fishnets.

[Edited by brandan89 on Apr 9th, 2005 at 07:31 PM]

[Mark Padgett]

Originally posted by brandan89
I hear their wanting to change the uniform.....


Striped shirt, instad of black pants, going with the fishnets.

You mean without shorts!?!?!?

[brandan89]

Hmmm... Lets hope they require them.

[refnrev]

Originally posted by Mark Padgett

You mean without shorts!?!?!?

__________________________________________________ _________

Padgett,
You scare me some days, man -- you really do! (LOL)
RR

[Spence]

Originally posted by BktBallRef

That's correct. It's a violation for a seconf player to be OOB when his team's thrower is already OOB with the ball.

Is this true only on a designated throw-in and not true after a made basket? I'm picturing the OOB play where A1 is taking it out against pressure, A2 runs out of bounds where A1 then passes it to him and A1 then goes inbounds to receive the pass.

Is this only a violation if its on a designated throw-in?

[Camron Rust]

Originally posted by Spence

Is this true only on a designated throw-in and not true after a made basket? I'm picturing the OOB play where A1 is taking it out against pressure, A2 runs out of bounds where A1 then passes it to him and A1 then goes inbounds to receive the pass.

Is this only a violation if its on a designated throw-in?

You are correct. The restriction is only applicable on a designated spot throwin.

[FrankHtown]

OK, then...my question is...if we see a teammate of the thrower run out of bounds, for example, to get behind a screen, ...why aren't we calling a violation, and make giving the technical a moot point?

[walter]

The only potential rule change that I've heard of (from a committee member)and apparently it is getting very serious consideration is expanding the high school coaching box to match the college coaching box (i.e. end line to 28 foot line). Other than that, nothing dramatic is being discussed.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally posted by FrankHtown
OK, then...my question is...if we see a teammate of the thrower run out of bounds, for example, to get behind a screen, ...why aren't we calling a violation, and make giving the technical a moot point?

Call the violation on a spot throw-in. Otherwise, for non throw-in situations, call the T if a player goes OOB and gains an unfair advantage.

[Spence]

Originally posted by Camron Rust

You are correct. The restriction is only applicable on a designated spot throwin.

Good to know.

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally posted by walter
The only potential rule change that I've heard of (from a committee member)and apparently it is getting very serious consideration is expanding the high school coaching box to match the college coaching box (i.e. end line to 28 foot line). Other than that, nothing dramatic is being discussed.

Seems kind of pointless to me. I think I've seen a coach out of his box on the baseline end maybe once in the last couple of years. It's the other end that coaches seem to want expanded.

[rainmaker]

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle

Seems kind of pointless to me. I think I've seen a coach out of his box on the baseline end maybe once in the last couple of years. It's the other end that coaches seem to want expanded.

You may be right over all, but the few times I've had a coach down near the baseline, it's been to rag on my partner or me. To not be able to remind him or her of the box will just increase the wear and tear.

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally posted by rainmaker

You may be right over all, but the few times I've had a coach down near the baseline, it's been to rag on my partner or me. To not be able to remind him or her of the box will just increase the wear and tear.

That was my experience too. If they seriously want to look at improving the coaching box rule, require an electric fence around the existing box.

[refnrev]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
[B][QUOTE]Originally posted by rainmaker

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle

That was my experience too. If they seriously want to look at improving the coaching box rule, require an electric fence around the existing box.

__________________________________________________ _________

How about a little of that razor aharp wire like they use in prisons?