The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   2005-06 rules changes (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/19540-2005-06-rules-changes.html)

refnrev Tue Apr 05, 2005 08:29am

Don't the upcoming year's rule changes come out about this time of year. Anyone know when they will be released by the NFHS? I didn't see anything on their website.

bob jenkins Tue Apr 05, 2005 10:17am

The basketball rules committee meets on April 18.

Last year's changes were announce April 28.


JugglingReferee Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:30pm

I recall that twice in the past 6 years that I first heard of the new Fed rules in early May.

tjones1 Thu Apr 07, 2005 11:01pm

Any predictions?????

Back In The Saddle Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:34am

I predict no gray shirts or shot clock. I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul. I hope they add some clarification to the term path and to closely guarded.

BktBallRef Fri Apr 08, 2005 07:32am

Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul.
Say what?

Almost Always Right Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:17am

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul.
Say what?


^ What he said.

Snake~eyes Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:53am

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul.
Say what?

He must of called a lot of Ts....

Junker Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:06am

I've only seen it called once (it was me) and heard of it called twice. The only reason I called it was that the kid stepped back inbounds after running the length of the baseline oob, caught the ball and made the shot. I couldn't get away with a violation (he was clearly back inbounds) so I had to go with the T. The coach understood after my explanation. Luckily it was in a weekend middle school tournament and not in a HS game. I still think it should be a T, not a violation.

Dan_ref Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:09am

Quote:

Originally posted by Almost Always Right
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul.
Say what?


^ What he said.

He said "I...HOPE...THEY...MAKE...THE..."PLAYING OOB"...A...VIOLATION...INSTEAD...OF...A...TECHNICA L...FOUL"

FrankHtown Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:41am

Ok...where does 9-2-12 fit in? "No teammate of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins"

I interpret that to mean if a teammate of the thrower goes out of bounds, it's a throw-in violation. Is that the correct interpretation?

Are we to call a violation or a technical?

BktBallRef Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:03pm

Quote:

Originally posted by FrankHtown
Ok...where does 9-2-12 fit in? "No teammate of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins"

I interpret that to mean if a teammate of the thrower goes out of bounds, it's a throw-in violation. Is that the correct interpretation?

Are we to call a violation or a technical?

That's correct. It's a violation for a seconf player to be OOB when his team's thrower is already OOB with the ball.

brainbrian Fri Apr 08, 2005 01:25pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Snake~eyes
I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul.
I had a partner call it a violation, no one knew the difference. :D Then afterwards his teammate told him he couldn't do that. They player said "I know."

I would prefer the violation better.

refnrev Fri Apr 08, 2005 08:58pm


He said "I...HOPE...THEY...MAKE...THE..."PLAYING OOB"...A...VIOLATION...INSTEAD...OF...A...TECHNICA L...FOUL" [/B][/QUOTE]
__________________________________________________ _________
OK Dan.. I know you said it louder. Now can you say it a little slower.

refnrev Fri Apr 08, 2005 09:08pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Junker
I've only seen it called once (it was me) and heard of it called twice. The only reason I called it was that the kid stepped back inbounds after running the length of the baseline oob, caught the ball and made the shot. I couldn't get away with a violation (he was clearly back inbounds) so I had to go with the T. The coach understood after my explanation. Luckily it was in a weekend middle school tournament and not in a HS game. I still think it should be a T, not a violation.

__________________________________________________ _________
I've seen it called once and it was a bad call, in fact the call was ridiculous. It didn't even fit the situation it is designed to prevent. It was a bad T and I ended up having to have a fan ejected because he wouldn't get off my partner's back. I hope they change this to a violation.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1