mick |
Tue Oct 25, 2005 04:10pm |
Re: Re: tuck rule, (hmmmm)
Quote:
Originally posted by ThickSkin
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by ThickSkin
I know you were joking. It is hard to tell sometimes on here whether or not somebody is dead serious or joking. I figured <U>you were joking as was I</U>.
|
<B><font color = pink>"It sucks! Plain and simple. tom Brady fumbled the ball against Oakland. He didn't tuck it! I have enjoyed watching the Pats over the past few years don't get me wrong but the tuck rule is for sissies." - ThickSkin</font></B>
You were joking?
So, ...<LI>You think it's a good rule.<LI>You think Brady did not fumble?<LI>You think Brady tucked it?<LI>You have not enjoyed the Pats?<LI>You think the tuck rule is for real men?
:)
mick
M&M, think pink.
|
In terms of being upset that he said "What is wrong with the tuck rule" I was joking. But, I do not like the tuck rule, Brady fumbled (Oakland wins the superbowl, Bledsoe remains a Patriot, and the Cowboys are still wishing they didn't release Carter), the tuck rule is for sissies, and I have actually enjoyed the Patriots the past few years. They have done it the right way. Through the draft!!!
Are we on the same page now?
|
Yeah, I was on your page before I wasted your time. ;)
I agree, with you about the Patriots.
And further, I still think they are the best "team" in any current professional sport.
mick
|