The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 08:41am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
A1 while holding the ball in-bounds touches a coach or an official who is out-of-bounds. Legal or not?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 08:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
JR, are you asking this for the newbies or are you serious?
7-1-1

Hey, this was my 1500th post!

[Edited by Nevadaref on Oct 29th, 2004 at 09:53 AM]
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 08:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
Talking TOUCHES THEM WITH WHAT???

ball, foot, hand???????
__________________
DETERMINATION ALL BUT ERASES THE THIN LINE BETWEEN THE IMPOSSIBLE AND THE POSSIBLE!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 08:54am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
JR, are you asking this for the newbies or are you serious?
7-1-1

[Edited by Nevadaref on Oct 29th, 2004 at 09:48 AM]
Completely serious. And as I can see from your answer, it's obviously not just for newbies.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 08:55am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Re: TOUCHES THEM WITH WHAT???

Quote:
Originally posted by jritchie
ball, foot, hand???????
Anything but the ball-the ball is a separate situation.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 09:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
7-1-1 out of bounds when touches floor, or any object (BESIDES A PLAYER) So i would say you got nothing if he/she is touching player or coach that is oob....

now if the ball is touching anything out of bounds it's out of bounds...
__________________
DETERMINATION ALL BUT ERASES THE THIN LINE BETWEEN THE IMPOSSIBLE AND THE POSSIBLE!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 09:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Quote:
Originally posted by jritchie
7-1-1 out of bounds when touches floor, or any object (BESIDES A PLAYER) So i would say you got nothing if he/she is touching player or coach that is oob....

now if the ball is touching anything out of bounds it's out of bounds...
The reason that I cited 7-1-1 is that the coach or official qualifies as an object. If the player touches them while they are standing OOB, the player has committed an OOB violation.

JR, I still think this is simple. What am I missing?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 09:17am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
[/B]
The reason that I cited 7-1-1 is that the coach or official qualifies as an object. If the player touches them while they are standing OOB, the player has committed an OOB violation.

JR, I still think this is simple. What am I missing? [/B][/QUOTE]The correct answer maybe?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 09:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
The reason that I cited 7-1-1 is that the coach or official qualifies as an object. If the player touches them while they are standing OOB, the player has committed an OOB violation.

JR, I still think this is simple. What am I missing? [/B]
The correct answer maybe? [/B][/QUOTE]

Well then I await your wisdom, o'venerable one.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 09:35am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
[/B]
Well then I await your wisdom, o'venerable one. [/B][/QUOTE]Naw, not yet. Other people might post yet and agree with jritchie. And who says whether my answer, if it's different than your's, is right or not?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 09:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,910
I'll agree with Nevadaref.

Z
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 09:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Does it have something to do with if the coach or official is a female, and women are not objects?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 09:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman
I'll agree with Nevadaref.

Z
I would have to (and did, on another forum) until JR pointed out that 7.1.1A has been changed this year.



[Edited by bob jenkins on Oct 29th, 2004 at 10:46 AM]
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 09:51am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman
I'll agree with Nevadaref.

I would have to (and did, on another forum) until JR pointed out that 7.1.1A has been changed this year.

An un-freaking-announced change! No notice-no reference posted anywhere that I know of. Just throw it in the case book and see if anybody might happen to notice it. Lah me.

NEW case book play 7.1.1SitA says "People are NOT considered to be objects and play continues. Inadvertantly touching someone who is out-of-bounds, without gaining an advantage, is NOT considered a violation".

[Edited by Jurassic Referee on Oct 29th, 2004 at 10:55 AM]
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 09:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman
I'll agree with Nevadaref.

Z
I would have to (and did, on another forum) until JR pointed out that 7.1.1A has been changed this year.

[Edited by bob jenkins on Oct 29th, 2004 at 10:46 AM]
Well, since I haven't opened my new Case Book yet, I'll have to go do that.
Oh boy, can't say I like that ruling. This must have been written by a woman. "People are not considered to be objects and play continues."
Now I have to judge whether the player's touching was inadvertent and if he gained an advantage. Why did they change this?
So A1 can shove Team B's coach away from him because he is yelling in his ear and not be considered to be OOB? That should go over well. Let me go back to the fighting thread and review those bench clearing penalties again.

I did find it curious though that 7-1-2b specified "Any other person" and 7-1-1 only said object.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1