The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 12:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref

I agree that the intended and correct result is an OOB violation, not a T. But the rules makers have this annoying habit of making changes that are less than clear or consistent, which adds to the "magic decoder ring" feel that rookies and coaches tend to get when they attempt to map the words in the rules onto the calls made during an actual game.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 29, 2004, 12:52pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by jritchie

And if i grab on to someone to keep from falling or losing balance, i consider that doing it intenionally to gain an advantage, then it would be a violation oob!
I agee. FEd (and NCAA) still has the case play of a player "saving a ball" then coming back in and touching the ball as being legal.

And if they don't re-establish in-bounds status again after saving the ball and then re-touching it, it's a violation. Punishment fits the crime.

Under the language we got, though....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1