The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 23, 2004, 09:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Arctic Circle
Posts: 112
Send a message via Yahoo to JohnBark
Question

Team A has possession it's own FC. Player A1 passes the ball which is tipped by B1 in A's FC and then is tipped by A2 again who is in their FC. And then A2 recovers the tipped ball in the BC.

Is that over and back?

I called it over and back. Your thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 23, 2004, 09:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,674
Quote:
Originally posted by JohnBark
Team A has possession it's own FC. Player A1 passes the ball which is tipped by B1 in A's FC and then is tipped by A2 again who is in their FC. And then A2 recovers the tipped ball in the BC.

Is that over and back?

I called it over and back. Your thoughts?
Yes,B1's tip did not end team control and team A was the last to touch FC and the first to touch BC.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 23, 2004, 09:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Quote:
Originally posted by JohnBark
Team A has possession it's own FC. Player A1 passes the ball which is tipped by B1 in A's FC and then is tipped by A2 again who is in their FC. And then A2 recovers the tipped ball in the BC.

Is that over and back?

I called it over and back. Your thoughts?
If A is last to touch it in their FC and first to touch it after it goes to BC, it's a violation. Good call.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 27, 2004, 11:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 275
Think of it as an out of bounds play

If Team A has the ball, Team B tips it, then it hits a Team A player and goes out of bounds, you determine that Team A is responsible for the ball going out of bounds. The same applies to backcourt.

If you have to explain it to a coach, I find that this explanation is easier for them to understand if they are not sure of the rules.

You can apply the same logic if a Team A player jumps from the FC over the division line and taps it back before it hits in the backcourt. Just like if he saved it from going out of bounds.
__________________
Damain
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 28, 2004, 07:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,140
Re: Think of it as an out of bounds play

Quote:
Originally posted by Damian
If Team A has the ball, Team B tips it, then it hits a Team A player and goes out of bounds, you determine that Team A is responsible for the ball going out of bounds. The same applies to backcourt.

If you have to explain it to a coach, I find that this explanation is easier for them to understand if they are not sure of the rules.

You can apply the same logic if a Team A player jumps from the FC over the division line and taps it back before it hits in the backcourt. Just like if he saved it from going out of bounds.
You can use that logic on the plays you noted, but it fails on: A1 from the BC passes the ball to the FC. The ball hits B1 in the DC and rebounds directly to A1, still in the BC without hitting the ground.

This is not a BC violation, but would be an OOB violation on A.

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 30, 2004, 10:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 275
It still works

If A1 is performing a throw in and it hits B1, then hits A1 who is still out of bounds, A1 is considered to have caused the ball to go out of bounds.
__________________
Damain
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 30, 2004, 11:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 21
4 points to this violation: 1) front court status; 2)team control; 3) last to touch the ball in the fc; and 4) first to touch in the bc. In your scenario, you have all 4=violation.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 31, 2004, 12:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally posted by pauli
4 points to this violation: 1) front court status; 2)team control; 3) last to touch the ball in the fc; and 4) first to touch in the bc. In your scenario, you have all 4=violation.
Close, but not quite...

  • Team Control
  • Ball has had frontcourt status
  • Last to touch before it returned to the backcourt
  • First to touch after if returned to the backcourt

    The difference is yours specifies where the ball is touched while mine specifies when the ball is touched relateive to where the ball is. It may seem insignificant but it is different.

    Examples to illustrate the difference...

    A1 in the backcourt, throws the ball towards A2. However, it hits the ref (who is in the frontcourt). The ball returns to A1 (or A3) who is in the backcourt. Violation even though A never touched the ball while it was in the frontcourt. They were the last to touch it before it returned to the backcourt.

    A1 in a trap in the frontcourt at the division line. A1 throws a bounce pass across the court to A2. The bounce pass strikes the floor 4" behind the division line. A2 reaches over the line and catches it with both feet on the floor in front of the division line. Again, Violation. A1 was the last to touch before it hit the backcourt. A2 was the first to touch after it hit the backcourt. Yet no one touched it in the backcourt.

    [Edited by Camron Rust on Oct 31st, 2004 at 12:11 PM]
  • __________________
    Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
    Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
    Reply With Quote
      #9 (permalink)  
    Old Sun Oct 31, 2004, 07:32am
    Official Forum Member
     
    Join Date: Aug 1999
    Posts: 18,140
    Re: It still works

    Quote:
    Originally posted by Damian
    If A1 is performing a throw in and it hits B1, then hits A1 who is still out of bounds, A1 is considered to have caused the ball to go out of bounds.
    Right, but if A1 is throwing from the BC and the ball hits B1 in the FC, then hits A1 who is still in the BC, it's not a backcourt violation.

    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks


    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is On
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08am.



    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1