The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 05, 2004, 12:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
when I then had my knee scoped, my ortho put me on 50 mg per day of Vioxx. I guess I am not going climb the ladder to go up in the attic for a while am I.
Whoa, Mark. Check out today's new's stories, please. They're taking Vioxx off of the market.
I think Mark already knew that. I think that's why he won't be going up the ladder for a while -- b/c they've taken away his pain meds.
The meds I was on last week, I was climbing the walls. I'd have been glad to get his briefcase down for him!

ROFLMAO [/B]
Come on, Mark, it wasn't THAt funny!
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 05, 2004, 04:27pm
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,073
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
when I then had my knee scoped, my ortho put me on 50 mg per day of Vioxx. I guess I am not going climb the ladder to go up in the attic for a while am I.
Whoa, Mark. Check out today's new's stories, please. They're taking Vioxx off of the market.
I think Mark already knew that. I think that's why he won't be going up the ladder for a while -- b/c they've taken away his pain meds.
The meds I was on last week, I was climbing the walls. I'd have been glad to get his briefcase down for him!

ROFLMAO
Come on, Mark, it wasn't THAt funny! [/B]

Oh yes it was, because when I was on my meds, my wife would lock me in the attic. ;-) ;-) ;-)
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 17, 2004, 02:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Geneva, IL
Posts: 53
Just to clarify

Just to clarify.

So for a spot throw-in, the player throwing the ball in has a 3-foot "box" to work in and he can move within that "box" and it's not a violation?

What if he leaves that 3-foot "box"? Snaqwells said it's not traveling but simply a throw-in violation. So is the penalty to award the ball to the opposing team?
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 17, 2004, 05:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Re: Just to clarify

Quote:
Originally posted by actuary77
Just to clarify.

So for a spot throw-in, the player throwing the ball in has a 3-foot "box" to work in and he can move within that "box" and it's not a violation?

That's correct.

Quote:
What if he leaves that 3-foot "box"? Snaqwells said it's not traveling but simply a throw-in violation. So is the penalty to award the ball to the opposing team?
That's also correct.

Welcome to the forum!
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 17, 2004, 01:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Re: Just to clarify

Quote:
Originally posted by actuary77
Just to clarify.

So for a spot throw-in, the player throwing the ball in has a 3-foot "box" to work in and he can move within that "box" and it's not a violation?

What if he leaves that 3-foot "box"? Snaqwells said it's not traveling but simply a throw-in violation. So is the penalty to award the ball to the opposing team?
A 3-foot wide "box" that extends as far back as can be gone. He only has to keep one foot over that three foot "box". Which, if you think about it, makes that three foot "box" pretty wide. For example, he can move left in that box until only his right foot is over the box, then move back right until only his left foot is over that box. He can move back as far as he likes. If there's 10 feet back to the wall, he's got 10 feet. And, of course, he can jump. Multiple times.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 17, 2004, 04:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Geneva, IL
Posts: 53
Lightbulb Thanks!

Wow! Thanks all for the clarifications.

I always thought the traveling rules apply to the person throwing-in the ball as well (i.e. pivot foot rules). Like most of the people in the thread had indicated, I had seen multiple times traveling being called on the person throwing the ball in, both in the NBA and the NCAA. Maybe it's different for them but now I'm crystal clear on how it should be for the NFHS.

Thanks again!
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 17, 2004, 04:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Re: Thanks!

Quote:
Originally posted by actuary77
...but now I'm crystal clear on how it should be for the NFHS.
And now it's your duty and pleasure to find the balance between correcting others who don't have a clue, and feeling quietly smug and superior to be "in the know" yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 17, 2004, 07:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Re: Re: Thanks!

Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by actuary77
...but now I'm crystal clear on how it should be for the NFHS.
And now it's your duty and pleasure to find the balance between correcting others who don't have a clue, and feeling quietly smug and superior to be "in the know" yourself.
I find the quietly smug part to be a lot more fun
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 17, 2004, 07:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Re: Re: Re: Thanks!

Quote:
Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by actuary77
...but now I'm crystal clear on how it should be for the NFHS.
And now it's your duty and pleasure to find the balance between correcting others who don't have a clue, and feeling quietly smug and superior to be "in the know" yourself.
I find the quietly smug part to be a lot more fun
yes, and as a rule, more politically wise. However, the occasional authoritative word thrown into a clueless conversation has its afterglow.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1