Screening Posture

[ChuckElias]

Originally posted by mick
You say the defender was bumped.
Nay, not so. In the given sitch, the bent over player did not move

Poor choice of word on my part. True that the screener committed no overt act (i.e., did not move to cause the contact), but the contact caused the defender to move out of his path. And since the contact was on a part of the body that was outside the screener's verical plane, this is a foul on the screener. No? Vocabulary aside, do we really disagree?