The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2004, 07:24am
ace ace is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 530
Send a message via AIM to ace
We pregamed at camp that all techincal fouls and the 6th (special tourny rule that we were officiating) that we'd go opposite the table. Evaluators made some weird comments about it because we didnt tell them before we got on the floor but at half-time they thought it made perfect sense. I had a hard time remebering to stay opposite if I was already opposite. And new mechanics... I went to a college camp and worked mens mechanics for the similarities to high school. The high school camps around here couldnt fit my schedule. I also did work a few games with womens mechanics and REALLY like them. The leads converage is alot like 2 man. And I think with some minor changes about the little things would be better for high school.

__________________
John "acee" A.
Recently got a DWI - Driving With Icee.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2004, 06:10pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,520
Re: Consistency?

Quote:
Originally posted by Mregor


I just wish the Fed would have some consistency in their philosophy. I've never worked 3-man but am going to a 3-man camp in a few weeks so I've been reading up on the mechanics. In one breath, going tableside, they say it facilitates better communication. In another breath, they want the non-calling official to notify a coach of a DQ which is just awkward. The reasons for both seem to me to contradict each other. Sure the coach may be more upset when his/her star player is DQ'd on #5, but making my partner tell him isn't going to appease him. This has bugged me since they started that last year.

Mregor
I do not think the 5th foul mechanics remains anymore. I think someone found something on the NFHS website that suggest that not to be true. And if I am not mistaken, this was just a recommendation, not a requirement. I still told them last year in most cases. Honestly, just because the NF says it, does not mean we have to follow it. We were using the "kick" mechanic long before last year they put it in. Do what you feel confrontable with and the people you work for.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2004, 06:24pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Lightbulb Re: Re: Consistency?

Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
Honestly, just because the NF says it, does not mean we have to follow it. We were using the "kick" mechanic long before last year they put it in.
Rut,
I would like the "trip" signal.
Could be same as the kick.
mick
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1