Thread: Table Side??
View Single Post
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2004, 06:10pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,520
Re: Consistency?

Quote:
Originally posted by Mregor


I just wish the Fed would have some consistency in their philosophy. I've never worked 3-man but am going to a 3-man camp in a few weeks so I've been reading up on the mechanics. In one breath, going tableside, they say it facilitates better communication. In another breath, they want the non-calling official to notify a coach of a DQ which is just awkward. The reasons for both seem to me to contradict each other. Sure the coach may be more upset when his/her star player is DQ'd on #5, but making my partner tell him isn't going to appease him. This has bugged me since they started that last year.

Mregor
I do not think the 5th foul mechanics remains anymore. I think someone found something on the NFHS website that suggest that not to be true. And if I am not mistaken, this was just a recommendation, not a requirement. I still told them last year in most cases. Honestly, just because the NF says it, does not mean we have to follow it. We were using the "kick" mechanic long before last year they put it in. Do what you feel confrontable with and the people you work for.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote