The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 19, 2004, 01:12pm
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,172
I referenced a Casebook Play that can be applied to the play in the original post. The Casebook Play allows for a technical foul to be assesed. I agree 110% with all those have taken the position that a technical foul should be a very very rarely invoked penalty. And even in the play of the original post I would be very hesitant to assess a technical foul. I would have game management deal with the problem fan. BUT, while the word opponent was used in the Casebook Play RULING, I cannot support awarding a substitute free throw for disconcerting action. And, this is not a case where NFHS R2-S3 can or should be applied.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1