![]() |
|
|||
I had a sittuation last night that I have never ran into in 12 years of officiating. Between 3rd and 4th quarter after the 1st buzzer a coach sends a player in to sub. I catch the coach and tell him the the player has to wait till the 1st dead ball as she reported too late and that I needed the girl who finished the last quarter to come back into the game. The coach told me that he couldn't do that as the player who she was subbing for would then have played in too many quarters.
I could only think of three options that they had.... 1. Keep that girl in and start the quarter with a T ( although I am not sure that I can keep a girl in knowing that she played in too many quarters). 2. Start the quarter with 4 players and the sub could could enter on the next dead ball. 3. Coach could call a time out to be able to get the girl checked into the game. I think these are my only 3 options.. Can anyone else think of any more???? |
|
|||
I was talking with an official who said his partner got into the same situation last night. I think the Time Out or starting with 4 are probably correct in the rule book, but personally I do not think they are trying to break the intent of the rule. I would allow the sub. I think you cause a lot less problems that way.
|
|
|||
This comes from league rules and has no official stipulation at the game management level. The penalty would be assessed through the league. I don't think you can argue assessing a T for using a disqualified player since the player was not disqualified by NFHS rules.
I'm with Mark. Quietly let this go with a whispered warning. |
|
|||
Here is what I did.....
Last night when this happened it was about a 30 point game so I did let the sub come in and told both coaches why I allowed it to happen that way. Both coaches were cool about with it.
I agree with all of your answers but please let me know if you would change your answers if this would happen in a close game in the last minute of the state championship game???????? |
|
|||
Re: Here is what I did.....
Quote:
Z |
|
|||
Choose your battles
There is no reason not to just get the sub in and move on. Worry about the things that really matter. This is not something to get worked up about or to get really technical about. If a coach just wanted to sub for the sake of subbing, having them wait until the next dead ball is the right thing to do, and that is what would normally happen. This is a sub that is forced by an external policy not addressed in NFHS rules.
|
|
|||
What happens when the opposing coach (home team) and the official scorer (also from home team) are making a big deal of the situation and know by rule a T must be acessed. I too, would go with the preventative maintenance in most situations but what about in the above situation?
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|