|
Sat Nov 29, 2003, 10:52am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rule 9-10. Section 24 indicates the penalty for a Simultaneous Technical is No shots with resumption of Play at Point of interruption.
The chart on CR -160 indicates that "Each Foul carries it's own Penalty". COntradiction. What is correct?? Not that we would ever call a simultaneous technical!!! Any thoughts?? 
|
|
Sat Nov 29, 2003, 10:59am
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think there's a contradiction. It's just that in the case of double (or simultaneous) T's, the penalty is merely the charging of the fouls to the players and teams. The penalty doesn't include FTs. So it still carries its own penalty. The penalty is just slightly different from usual.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
|
|
Sun Nov 30, 2003, 12:14pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chuck,
If it says carries it own penanlty, the penalty for a direct or indirect is 2 shots then at point of interruption. Just think it's worded poorly. I agree the proper administration is no shots, just being nit picky.
|
|
Sun Nov 30, 2003, 02:51pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Each foul does have it's own penalty. But when a foul occurs against each team at the same time, the penalties for those fouls offset. That doesn't mean that their is no penalty, just that no shots are taken. The fouls still count against the player and the team and the team with the arrow will get the ball.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
