Switch, switch, switch…Who gets the desired match-up?

[bob jenkins]

It's come up before, and it's not covered by rule So, almost anything is allowed under 2-3.

For me, I make B (the lower blocks) choose first, then I let A choose, then I let the upper blocks for B choose and off we go.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

It's come up before, and it's not covered by rule So, almost anything is allowed under 2-3.

For me, I make B (the lower blocks) choose first, then I let A choose, then I let the upper blocks for B choose and off we go.

Please explain your rationale for doing it that way.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Please explain your rationale for doing it that way.

B gets the advantage of the lower blocks, so they need to choose first.

I also see and understand Raymond's way and rationale. :shrug:

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

It's come up before, and it's not covered by rule ...

Yes it has, with little closure.