Is this reviewable?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

Imagine if the try had been successful. Do we think for a second they’d have given him two more free throws?

Of course not. Which is why the call as it was lacked any semblance of believability.

I suppose there will be a push now to add the end of airborne shooter status to the list of things reviewable at the monitor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What other reason would there be for there to be two free throws awarded in that situation?

I've seen myself on video a few times blow calls this season. The reason I made those calls doesn't change just because now I see the replays and realize I was wrong.

It took me exactly one time of looking at that play on YouTube to realize what had happened in regards to the ruling. And that ruling had nothing to do with the gobbledygook the OP claimed came from the referee's mouth.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk