Fun With A Block Charge …

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by ilyazhito

In my judgement, the defender moved into the offensive player as he was going airborne. Therefore, he failed to beat the offensive player to the spot, and the ruling of a block is the correct one. I normally like to give the defender the benefit of the doubt and rule a player control foul, but I cannot do so in this case.

I think you're being faked out by the fact that he gets on his tip-toes just prior to contact. It's an unnecessary embellishment by the defender that probably cost him the call.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Raymond

I think you're being faked out by the fact that he gets on his tip-toes just prior to contact. It's an unnecessary embellishment by the defender that probably cost him the call.

Then we have to do better than that IMO. He does not move of any significance. He is not required to be a statue. He just has to be in position. Again we call way too many fouls on defenders for doing really nothing illegal and we allow offensive players to do all kinds of things and it is just fine if they knock someone on their ass.

Peace

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Then we have to do better than that IMO. He does not move of any significance. He is not required to be a statue. He just has to be in position. Again we call way too many fouls on defenders for doing really nothing illegal and we allow offensive players to do all kinds of things and it is just fine if they knock someone on their ass.



Peace

I can see how an official can be faked out. An official who is straight-lined could see both heels coming off the ground and interpret that as the defender moving forward.

Doesn't make the officials call right, but it does explain how these errors can happen when players do things that are not necessary, only to embellish the contact.

In order to correct ourselves as officials, we have to find out why we're making the mistake in the first place.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Raymond

I can see how an official can be faked out. An official who is straight-lined could see both heels coming off the ground and interpret that as the defender moving forward.

Doesn't make the officials call right, but it does explain how these errors can happen when players do things that are not necessary, only to embellish the contact.

In order to correct ourselves as officials, we have to find out why we're making the mistake in the first place.

I do agree with you about being "faked out." I can also see this as well. My point is we do not even give the defenders a slight benefit in many cases. And that is something I try not to do. If I have to split hairs on movement, then I give plays like this to the defense all day long. I think calling charges, in the long run, helps your games. You call this a block, you will have to call many more because not the offensive player never has to think of not getting the call. Call a charge and then they start wondering. So it is more for me than just being "faked out" but what is better for the game. Kind of like calling travel on something that is very hard to tell at full speed.

Peace

[BillyMac]

A little birdie told me that this was a player control foul.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

A little birdie told me that this was a player control foul.

???

Is there some big secret?

The video tells me it's a PC foul.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Raymond

???

One can never be too careful. I'm on their radar. Black helicopters are circling overhead.

Originally Posted by BillyMac

... IAABO Make The Call Videos ... were the copyrighted property of IAABO and could not be reproduced or used without the express written permission of IAABO ... suggested that I stop sharing these and that if I didn't stop that I could be subject to a suspension from the IAABO Make The Call Video email list, or worse, a suspension from IAABO.