Warning ???

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Mike Goodwin

I can't find anywhere where the book explicitly states anything like, "a technical foul assessed to a team under 10-5 before a warning is issued under 4-48, also counts as that team's warning."

Agree, and I've spent all day looking.

This takes care of part of the issue (no behavior warning after first behavior violation (warning or technical foul)): For the first violation of Rule 10-6-1, the official must warn the head coach unless the offense is judged to be major, in which case a technical foul must be assessed. It only states "first violation", not second violation.

IAABO quiz states to also "issue the warning" after a technical foul for the first behavior "violation". Would like to understand the basis for their ruling, if there is one, or maybe they're wrong.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Agree, and I've spent all day looking.



Close, but no cigar.

Change "major" to "minor" and then we're cooking with gas.

If it was major OR a T or warning was previously issued...

So, if a T was previously issued, there's no need for a warning. So, the first T serves as a warning.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

So, if a T was previously issued, there's no need for a warning. So, the first T serves as a warning.

Thanks for your time, effort, and input.

IAABO quiz states to do both for one event, the technical foul and a warning.

Would like to understand the basis for their ruling, if there is one, or maybe they're wrong.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

If it was major OR a T or warning was previously issued... So, if a T was previously issued, there's no need for a warning. So, the first T serves as a warning.

Deleted "major' comet after you spotted it. My post didn't make sense to me (neither did Mike Goodwin's try at a helpful interpretation). Sorry.