Illinois-Mizzou flagrant foul

[JRutledge]

Peace

[Nevadaref]

There is a problem with the rule for a monitor review in a case such as this, namely that the basket which the offending player/team scored still counts!

If the monitor review results in a foul being charged to the scoring team during that offensive possession (prior to when the goal was made), then the goal should be canceled.

[Nevadaref]

Question for our current NCAAM officials:
During a monitor review such as this one can the officials only charge an F1 or F2 or do they have the option to charge a common foul which would be a team control foul in this instance? (Or a PC if the situation warranted it. For example, the post player in this video had already caught the pass and then this contact occurred.)

In an NFHS game, I would call a team control foul.

[Camron Rust]

That isn't even foul.

The defender reacted BEFORE the hand got there. And the hand got there because he (the defender) pulled it there.

Academy Award Nomination there!!!

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

That isn't even foul.

The defender reacted BEFORE the hand got there. And the hand got there because he (the defender) pulled it there.

Academy Award Nomination there!!!

I think this is a foul, but not an F1 IMO. The use of his arm has been seen as illegal and as he extends his arms. Now the antics by the defender certainly was overplayed.

Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I think this is a foul, but not an F1 IMO. The use of his arm has been seen as illegal and as he extends his arms. Now the antics by the defender certainly was overplayed.

Peace

I see it more like a hook and hold by the defender pulling the offensive player's arm into his own face....making it look like the offensive player fouled.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I see it more like a hook and hold by the defender pulling the offensive player's arm into his own face....making it look like the offensive player fouled.

I can see that argument. Depends on whether or not the initial extension of the offensive player is continue a ward-off or not.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I see it more like a hook and hold by the defender pulling the offensive player's arm into his own face....making it look like the offensive player fouled.

Neither post player can extend their arms and it was said this is a foul. That to me was missed or should have been called based on the videos and explanation from JD and the NCAA on the matter.

Peace

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Question for our current NCAAM officials:
During a monitor review such as this one can the officials only charge an F1 or F2 or do they have the option to charge a common foul which would be a team control foul in this instance? (Or a PC if the situation warranted it. For example, the post player in this video had already caught the pass and then this contact occurred.)

In an NFHS game, I would call a team control foul.

If a foul is whistled, then any type of fouls can be called. If there was no whistle for a foul on the play, then you can only come back from the monitor with nothing, F1, or F2.