NCAA Shot Clock Violation Question

[crosscountry55]

Is there a new rule whereby if the shot clock expires while a try that does not touch the rim is in flight, and the defense collects the airball, there is no whistle for a shot clock violation?

Saw this during Iowa @ Indiana, B1G Network, 2/13, 2nd Half at 9:35.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JRutledge]

No.

Peace

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

Is there a new rule whereby if the shot clock expires while a try that does not touch the rim is in flight, and the defense collects the airball, there is no whistle for a shot clock violation?

Saw this during Iowa @ Indiana, B1G Network, 2/13, 2nd Half at 9:35.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

No.

Well that’s interesting because I saw them not blow one again on the other end about five clock minutes later.

I guess they must have pregamed this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

Well that’s interesting because I saw them not blow one again on the other end about five clock minutes later.

I guess they must have pregamed this.

I have not seen the play in question. I have no idea what took place either way. But there is not rule change with the shot clock other than going to 20 seconds when the offense rebounds the ball in the FC or 30 seconds if recovered in the BC.

Peace

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

Is there a new rule whereby if the shot clock expires while a try that does not touch the rim is in flight, and the defense collects the airball, there is no whistle for a shot clock violation?

Saw this during Iowa @ Indiana, B1G Network, 2/13, 2nd Half at 9:35.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Per your description, there should have been a whistle for a violation.

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by Raymond

Per your description, there should have been a whistle for a violation.

As IAABO would say, “Let’s go to the video tape!”

The announcers even said something like, “Indiana picks it up so we’ll just go the other way.” They said it almost matter-of-factly which is why I thought maybe there had been a recent rule change I was unaware of.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

As IAABO would say, “Let’s go to the video tape!”

They stole this from Warner Wolf, a local news sports anchor in Washington, D.C. and New York City.

[JRutledge]

I just saw the video. I can post this. But it seems like you can make a case that the defender has the ball secure, if that is the case then you would not call a violation or stop play. This to me is either way decision. If Iowa was near the ball or was contesting the possession of the ball, then I think you have to call a violation.

Peace

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I just saw the video. I can post this. But it seems like you can make a case that the defender has the ball secure, if that is the case then you would not call a violation or stop play. This to me is either way decision. If Iowa was near the ball or was contesting the possession of the ball, then I think you have to call a violation.



Peace

That seemed to be the opinion of the announcers, too. But I would like to have a debate about this with the video. I don’t remember this being “bang bang.” The horn sounded mid-flight, then the try missed the rim. Plenty of time to process and then whistle the violation. I think this was a deliberate bending of the rule by the crew. Maybe this is something the assignor wants done in the Big Ten?

There’s no doubt a call here would have been a game interruptor. I’m just wondering if by bending the rules it’s not the top of a slippery slope?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk