2019-20 NFHS Rules Changes

[Zoochy]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Have esteemed Forum members come to a consensus that this is an out of bounds violation rather than a throwin violation?

Has this topic not generated a lot of debate because the answer is so clear and simple?

Two members say it's an out of bounds violation (bob jenkins, JRutledge, also add third member, BillyMac).

One member says it's a throwin violation (ilyazhito).

Add my name.
It is an OUT OF BOUNDS violation.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Freddy

2007,08 Interpretation SITUATION 3: During an alternating-possession throw-in for Team A, thrower A1 passes the ball directly on the court where it contacts (a) A2 or (b) B2, while he/she is standing on a boundary line. RULING: Out-of-bounds violation on (a) A2; (b) B2. The player was touched by the ball while out of bounds, thereby ending the throw-in. The alternating-possession arrow is reversed and pointed toward Team B's basket when the throw-in ends (when A2/B2 is touched by the ball). A throw-in is awarded at a spot nearest the out-of-bounds violation for (a) Team B; (b) Team A. (4-42-5; 6-4-4; 9-2-2; 9-3-2)

Nice citation Freddy. Much thanks.

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

The "OOB violation" was the rule / interp for a number of years. Then, unexplainedly, NFHS changed it to "TI violation" ...

Correct.

For a while, in ancient times, the NFHS interpretation for the situation above, if player B2 caught the ball while standing on a boundary line, was that it was ruled a throwin violation of thrower A1 and then Team B received the ball for a designated spot throwin at the spot of the original throwin by A1.

Not any more.

My mantra has always been that it's not the rules that are difficult, it's the rule changes that are difficult, which is why I brought up this situation for confirmation earlier in the thread, back in post #71, after reading the 2019-20 Point of Emphasis on throwin violations.

Also, I'm not sure that "unexplainedly" is a real word, if it isn't, it should be, especially in regard to NFHS interpretations.

[socalif]

1. is there a CA or UTAH restricted arc this season?

2. 2 or 3 person, boys is there supposed to be a visible 10 second back court count? CA or UTAH?

So many videos now for 19-20 I see no 10 second count, especially for 3 person.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by socalif

1. is there a CA or UTAH restricted arc this season?

2. 2 or 3 person, boys is there supposed to be a visible 10 second back court count? CA or UTAH?

So many videos now for 19-20 I see no 10 second count, especially for 3 person.

For NCAA-Men's, there is no visible 10 second backcourt count unless the shot clock is turned off. What rule set are CA and Utah using?