SEC Championship Game

[SC Official]

At 14:52 in the second half Auburn #4 was fouled hard and went to the ground. Multiple coaches came onto the floor to check on #4, yet he still attempted the free throws. I don't believe a timeout was granted to Auburn. Shouldn't a mandatory substitution have been required?

[Rich]

Originally Posted by SC Official

At 14:52 in the second half Auburn #4 was fouled hard and went to the ground. Multiple coaches came onto the floor to check on #4, yet he still attempted the free throws. I don't believe a timeout was granted to Auburn. Shouldn't a mandatory substitution have been required?

They reviewed the play, right?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

[SC Official]

They did, but I don’t think that has anything to do with the required substitution rule.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by SC Official

They did, but I don’t think that has anything to do with the required substitution rule.

Possible they didn't notice Pearl out there. Or just whiffed on the rule.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Raymond]

Pearl's request for a review was had already been granted. After that point they're not worried about Pearl coming on the court, or at least I wouldn't be.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

At 14:52 in the second half Auburn #4 was fouled hard and went to the ground. Multiple coaches came onto the floor to check on #4, yet he still attempted the free throws. I don't believe a timeout was granted to Auburn. Shouldn't a mandatory substitution have been required?

Peace

[sdoebler]

Agree with common foul call. The defensive player swung both arms down at the ball, and while the offensive player moved the ball to the outside which made all of the contact against the player it is still a legitimate play at the ball with nothing excessive.