DOG under 5 seconds left

[UNIgiantslayers]

My 2 cents: The act in the OP is unsporting enough to justify a T on those grounds, no need for a DOG procedure. I would also agree with the crew letting the kid from the inbounding (winning) team go get the ball or wait for the ball to make its way back to him. At that point, the game is probably over.

If the kid does this same thing earlier in the game, I'm probably going to go to a T for an unsporting act, not a DOG warning.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by UNIgiantslayers

The act in the OP is unsporting enough to justify a T on those grounds, no need for a DOG procedure ... If the kid does this same thing earlier in the game, I'm probably going to go to a T for an unsporting act, not a DOG warning.

10-2 Team Technical
ART. 1 Allow the game to develop into an actionless contest, this includes the following and similar acts:
b. Delay the game by preventing the ball from being made promptly live or from being put in play.
e. Interfering with the ball following a goal after any team warning for delay.

10-3 Player Technical: A player shall not: Delay the game by acts such as: Preventing the ball from being made live promptly or from being put in play.