NCAA Men's Logo Question

[HokiePaul]

Wouldn't it have to be interpreted as once on each piece of apparel. Otherwise, any normal pair of socks with a swoosh/three stripes/etc. on each sock would be "2 logos".

[bucky]

Originally Posted by HokiePaul

Wouldn't it have to be interpreted as once on each piece of apparel. Otherwise, any normal pair of socks with a swoosh/three stripes/etc. on each sock would be "2 logos".

I agree with this however, in that case, shouldn't it be written as "..and once on each other item of apparel excluding the undershirt."

It just seems to be poorly written. Perhaps it would be a good question for said supervisor. Although, then again, asking such questions over the grammar/context in use can be a good way to go on the crap list of a supervisor.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by HokiePaul

Wouldn't it have to be interpreted as once on each piece of apparel. Otherwise, any normal pair of socks with a swoosh/three stripes/etc. on each sock would be "2 logos".

For that matter, wouldn't most shoes be illegal since most have at least 2 logos, sometimes 3-4. :0

[ilyazhito]

Shoes and socks are not considered part of the uniform, whether at the NFHS or NCAA levels. I would interpret the bolded part as once on each item (one logo on headband, one logo on each wristband, one logo on undershirt, one logo on tights/leg sleeves, one logo on each arm sleeve).

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by ilyazhito

Shoes and socks are not considered part of the uniform, whether at the NFHS or NCAA levels. I would interpret the bolded part as once on each item (one logo on headband, one logo on each wristband, one logo on undershirt, one logo on tights/leg sleeves, one logo on each arm sleeve).

Not true for NCAAW (unless it's a recent rules change that I missed).

edit: they are not part of the uniform. But, they are part of apparel, and governed by the logo rules.

Big kerfluffle a couple of years ago over "two-logoed socks" -- players were supposed to turn the socks down to cover the logos. If the sock had only one logo (and many / most do, now), it was legal.