Block or PC?

[thumpferee]

Originally Posted by frezer11

I can't help but laugh at your post that says, "NM, I can't get the video to upload," followed by your tagline of, "A picture is worth a thousand words." Truer words never spoken!

Lol. Look again

[deecee]

Block then 2 sets of double T's

1 on the 2 involved in the original call
1 on the tall and short guy

I know they went PC probably because the armbar extended but that's a normal reaction when a defender just runs into you like that.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by deecee

Block then 2 sets of double T's

1 on the 2 involved in the original call
1 on the tall and short guy

I know they went PC probably because the armbar extended but that's a normal reaction when a defender just runs into you like that.

Block, but I only have two T's -- the original blue player, then the white player who rushes in to "help" his teammate

[deecee]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Block, but I only have two T's -- the original blue player, then the white player who rushes in to "help" his teammate

Bob you don't think the square up of tall and short in that type of environment was T worthy? Also a guess, but they weren't talking about the weather.

[jeremy341a]

Originally Posted by deecee

Bob you don't think the square up of tall and short in that type of environment was T worthy? Also a guess, but they weren't talking about the weather.

I think it is most definitely T worthy. I can't really think of a good reason why it wouldn't be.

[Pantherdreams]

I'm not going to watch the rest of the game to get context but I am assuming based on the reaction to the forearm that things have been building in this game. Using my FIBA vernacular:

Step 1 - Block on defender
Step 2 - Unsportsmanlike on offensive player for shove.
Step 3 - Double Tech's on the original offenders
Step 4 - Double Tech's on on the smash brothers squaring off up stage.

[ballgame99]

Block 100%.

Then 2 sets of double Ts. And what to make of the kid waiving his arms inciting the crowd? Not sure if that is something to penalize, but I don't like it.

Edit to add: They ejected the kid that got fouled in the first place!? I assume they ejected the kid that did the fouling too? How 10 Blue gets out of that without a tech is interesting.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by deecee

Bob you don't think the square up of tall and short in that type of environment was T worthy? Also a guess, but they weren't talking about the weather.

I think white "tall" gets a T here. I'm not sure blue "short" gets another for any physical actions / reactions.

Of course, if words are exchanged, that might lead to a T.

[griblets]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Block, but I only have two T's -- the original blue player, then the white player who rushes in to "help" his teammate

What about the unnecessarily forceful arm by W21? I'm not opposed to PC foul, possibly even intentional.

What about B10 shoving W23 (player "helping" his teammate)?

I'd likely have two sets of double T's.

And then I'd hope we T W24 for inciting the crowd as he walks back to the bench.